Mr. McDougal,
You have told the public a number of times if we have city concerns or issues with staff we can come to you first and let you try to work it out. We have come to you with many issues and so far you have chose to do nothing. I’m going to give you one more shot at it. If nothing is done I will not only take it to council but I will also take it to the Taxpayer.
I was a little confused at first with your style of governing, but I wanted to at least give you a little time to settle in because you appeared to be so nice (Charming). I was willing to play the game and as of today I think I get it, from this day forward I will consider you a SMOOTH OPERATOR.
My concern of the day is with, steamy office romances paid for by the taxpayers . An office romance can start with a little gesture like a simple valentine on Valentine’s day.
Let me tell you a true story. There was this very educated and classy woman (let’s call her Mrs. J) she had no idea her husband was having an affair at the office. One day the OTHER woman’s husband showed up to Mrs. J’s home and told her their spouses were having an affair. Mrs. J became so mad , she went to her husband’s office started a physical altercation with him and then the police became involved. This kind of scenario can create a potential risk to staff at any workplace. It’s as clear as black and white , right or wrong there are no two ways about it.
I think an open , honest, and serious dialog needs to take place on this very important subject matter because it has overwhelming implications. The most obvious is when the gossip starts and staff looses respect for those involved. It creates an environment of potential risk, accusations of favoritism, workplace disharmony, and above all office affairs complicate business operations. This can cost the taxpayer millions of dollars and I believe it has.
Not only do I think the dialog needs to take place. I also believe that staff –involved-relationships , need to be made public especially if taxpayer dollars are used to facilitate the relationship. It has been a silent expense on the taxpayer for generations, lunches, traveling, and hotels, this needs to be exposed. The taxpayer needs to know how their money is being spent and who is misusing funds. This kind of behavior has gone on way to long at City Hall .
Besides the financial impact to the city there is also a quality of work issue. Unqualified employees have risen through the ranks at city hall not for their qualifications but because they were sleeping with their boss. The public depends on the staff to run the city in an efficient manner. Misuse of public funds need to stop and be exposed. A Cheat is a cheat is a cheat if they are willing to cheat on their spouse, they are willing to cheat on the public.
I have to ask myself why does an organization like the city allow this to happen without addressing the sex issue straightforward. Are they uncomfortable with the subject matter or are they all just
TOO SMOOTH…….
Mr. McDougal, Thank-you for your time and your service to the city of Riverside. It’s been fun.
Vivian Moreno , VIC (Very Informed Citizen)
TMC, RATED RIVERSIDE’S MOST “OFFENSIVE,” “INAPPROPRIATE,” “HURTFUL,” “MEAN SPIRITED,” “DISTASTEFUL,” “EMBARRASSING,” HORIFFIC,” “SLANDEROUS” AND MEZZSPELLED, “MISSPELLED” AND “OPINIONATED” BLOG SITE! TEMPORARILY BLOCKED BY THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE AT PUBLIC ACCESS SITES WITHIN THE CITY, THEN UNBLOCKED. I GUESS YOU CANNOT DO THAT ACCORDING TO THE ACLU. RATED ONE TWO ONE STAR OUT OF FIVE IN TERMS OF COMMUNITY APPROVAL RATINGS.. TMC IS NOW EXCLUSIVLY EXCLUSIVELY ON FILE WITH THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE’S DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE (WE BELIEVE THIS WILL END SOON, SINCE THE FOCUS IS NOW ON THE IMPROPRIETIES OF MR. “Z”, WE TRIED TO TELL YOU, BUT NOBODY LISTENED), AND DON’T FORGET WE ARE PROSSIBLY POSSIBLY ON FILE WITH THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE’S POTENTIAL SLAPP SUIT LIST… A STRATEGIC LEGAL MANEUVER THAT CAN BE DONE ONLY IN RIVERSIDE WITHOUT A CONTRACT… AGAIN, THANK-YOU COMMUNITY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE EMPLOYEE’S FOR YOUR SUPPORT! COMMENTS ALWAYS WELCOMED, ESPECIALLY SPELL CHECKERS! WE JUST CAN’T SPELL! EMAIL ANONYMOUSLY WITH YOUR DIRT BY CONTACTING US AT: THIRTYMILESCORRUPTION@HOTMAIL.COM
I like where you say that if a person will cheat on their spouse they will cheat on the taxpayers. I totally agree with this.
I don’t get it. You laid out a whole pile of innuendos and it’s hard to get at the root of your concern(s). 1. What, exactly are you asserting is happening? 2. Who — exactly — is involved here? 3. What makes this a “taxpayer” concern rather than an employee/personnel issue?
Listen to the song, then read the letter again. More to come..
Demented. Unsubscribing. You’re a whack job.
Sorry to lose you Remmy, but we did a story back in May 2011 regarding Sexual Favoritism in the Workplace. https://thirtymilesofcorruption.com/2011/05/29/riverside-sexual-favoritism-in-the-workplace/ In this posting we cited Miller vs. California Department of Corrections, whereby in office romances can cause favoritism in such a way that it can be considered harassment to the other employees. Employees in California may now sue their employers for sexual harassment if the sexual affair between a superior and a subordinate results in sexual favoritism. It is a Violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act. Which means that if sexual favoritism exist, it can impede or interfere with another employees ability to advance within the workplace, therefore this can be cause for a lawsuit and costly liability. We are assembling documents for the follow up story. The following link is a synopsis of Miller vs. California Department of Corrections http://www.minorityjobs.net/article/89/Bosss-Favorable-Treatment-of-Lovers-Can-Be-Harassment-for-Others-by-LINDA-COADY-ESQ-Andrews-Publications-Staff-Writer-Bosss-Favorable-Treatment-of-Lovers-Can-Be-Harassment-for-Others-by-LINDA-COADY-ESQ-Andrews-Publications-Staff-Writer.html I agree, all eleven of us here at TMC are in many ways whack jobs and demented.
Wow, that sound like what happened to Tom De Santis and his Twinkie Bruni Mercardo. Tommy boy and she were off doing their thing in the parking lot amount just a few places. Tom had reimbursements from hotels in San Diego, etc. it wasn’t until those fiesty gals on the 7th floor stood up and cried foul. Tom and his asst. Bruni were off traipsing around town and apparently San Diego till the gals on the 7th floor said. NO MORE. That could have cost the city big time having creating an unfavorable work condition. We just transferred Bruni and Tommmy Boy got a huge payout at taxpayers expense. Now he’s in MV up to usual tricks. Tommy even testified in the Neely Nakurma case that he worried about time card fraud. Really Tom just because you were management doesn’t mean your absolved. By the way Tommy’s wife did approach city hall about the affair. Personally, the guy is short, ugly and an ass, yuck. Really Bruni you couldn’t do any better?
Remmy are you aka Bruni?
This city is so corrupt it make Al Capone look like a sissy By the way the utility co is putting in new generators for the homes on the toxic site of Ag Park whose sleeping with Cox these days must be an electrian