Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Todays Mayoral 2016 Debate held at Charter Studios held this morning, sponsored by the Raincross Group.  This was a short recording by a cell phone on the Raincross Facebook Page, the full video will be brought to you when posted on Raincross site.

TMC, RATED RIVERSIDE’S REGIONAL COUNTIES MOST, “NEGATIVE,” “RAUNCHY,” “LOW CLASS,” “VISIONS OF GRANDEUR,” “FULL OF B.S.,” “IGNORANT,” “MISGUIDED,” “BULLYISH,” “FILTHY,” “SICK,” “PERVERTED,” “DEFAMATORY,” “STUPID,” “PATHETIC,” “DESPICABLE,” “DISAPPOINTING,” “BELOW THE BELT,” “A NEW LOW,” “SHOCKING,” “OFFENSIVE,” “OBNOXIOUS,” “INAPPROPRIATE,” “HURTFUL,” “MEAN SPIRITED,” “DISTASTEFUL,” “EMBARRASSING,” HORIFFIC,” “SLANDEROUS” “FIT TO BE VIEWED FROM THE REAR” AND MEZZSPELLED, “MISSPELLED” AND “OPINIONATED” BLOG SITE!  YES WE ADMIT WE OUR ALL OF THAT AND MORE, WHICH IN CURRENT TERMS IS KNOWN AS “UNPOLITICALLY CORRECT.”  TEMPORARILY BLOCKED BY THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE AT PUBLIC ACCESS SITES WITHIN THE CITY, THEN UNBLOCKED.  I GUESS YOU CANNOT DO THAT ACCORDING TO THE ACLU.  RATED ONE TWO ONE STAR OUT OF FIVE IN TERMS OF COMMUNITY APPROVAL RATINGS..  … AGAIN, THANK YOU COMMUNITY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE EMPLOYEE’S FOR YOUR SUPPORT!  CONTACT US:  thirtymilescorruption@hotmail.com

THIRTY MILES OF CORRUPTION WANTS TO THANK THE FIRST THOUSAND PEOPLE TO HIT THIS ARTICLE BY 11:00 A.M.!

frntpglawsuit

Electric Prop 26 Law Suit

Subject:  Press Release for Immediate Distribution – Lawsuit filed challenging City of Riverside Electric General Fund Transfer as a violation of Proposition 26

In a complaint filed yesterday in Riverside Superior Court, the Law Offices of Raychele B. Sterling brought allegations that the City of Riverside, through its ownership of Riverside Public Utilities (“RPU”), violated Proposition 26, approved by voters in 2010, when the City Council in December of 2013 changed the formula by which it calculates the tax generated from electric utility operating revenues (known as the General Fund Transfer), so as to increase taxes paid by its ratepayers to its general fund.  The complaint contends that the City Council changed the formula to pay off a settlement agreement involving the City’s water utility, and did so without a public vote as required by the State of California Constitution.

According to the filing, the City of Riverside violated its City Charter for a decade by transferring a portion of the monies it receives annually as part of its participation in the California Independent System Operator system, referred to as the Transmission Revenue Requirement, to its general fund instead of keeping those monies at its electric utility.  Further, the City classified the Transmission Revenue Requirement as non-operating revenues for a decade before intentionally misclassifying them as operating revenues for the sole purpose of extracting higher taxes from its electric utility customers.

The plaintiff seeks to halt the approximately $40 million/year the City collects in taxes from its electric ratepayers as part of its General Fund Transfer and to return the $115 million in transfer taxes taken the past 3 years from RPU.

“For years city officials have ignored near-constant complaints by members of the general public that Riverside Public Utilities has been overcharging its customers in order to support the City’s general fund,” Ms. Sterling said.  “Today, we begin to shine a light on the hidden taxes the City of Riverside has imposed upon its RPU’s customers – particularly the elderly, poor, and disabled – causing them considerable economic and personal hardship.  It was particularly sickening to discover that this illegal tax increase was a scheme devised by the City to avoid having its general fund pay off a settlement agreement regarding an illegal water utility tax.  These financial shell games must end.”

Established in 1895, Riverside Public Utilities is a consumer-owned water and electric utility governed by a Board of nine community volunteers that provides services to over 105,000 metered electric customers and 63,000 metered water customers throughout the City of Riverside.

The Law Offices of Raychele B. Sterling is located in Riverside, California and provides law services to victims of government fraud, abuse and corruption.

Again I believe we have a disconnect between the ratepayers and the City.  The City created a situation whereby no one had any other choice but to bring forward a lawsuit due to concerns of RPU monies, it seems this is the only way they listen.  We cannot wait another 13 years before our voices are heard.  What will Michael Colantuono have to say about this?

Colantuono-Michael-2015-240x300

MICHAEL COLANTUONO, ESQ.

Again, most of this occurred under the watchful eyes of former Public Utilities General Manager Dave Wright, who left (maybe saw the writing on the wall) to ‘sin city,’ Las Vegas, then to Los Angeles, where recently they have had there own set of embarrassing problems.

n22i3k-wwright0712binary1098362

DAVE WRIGHT, FORMER RPU GENERAL MANAGER

But, Wright came back to write a contributing editorial, titled “Riverside Water for Responsible Development,” back in 2014.  Was Wright simply worried that what was concealed would be exposed? Why was he so concerned about the Prosecutorial Issue of Measure A?

DWworriedone  DWworriedtwo  DWworriedthree

And Don’t forget to VOTE for Vivian Moreno Mayor 2016…..She will definitely  keep everyone HONEST!

UPDATE: 05.02.2016: HUMAN RESOURCES BRENDA DIEDRICHS LEAVES THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE, TO BE RECYLED TRASH AT A NEW JOB IN ORANGE COUNTY.

bd

Will the City Attorney’s Office Audit show that her law firm, Law Offices of Brenda Diedrichs,  was paid indiscriminately with tax payer monies, due the fact there was no contract? While working as Human Resource Director?  This while on Councilman Davis’s and Mayor Bailey’s watch.  Which were told, but did nothing…

lawfirmsoutsidelegal

Performance Audit2

What is really telling is that Senator Roth’s Law Firm is on this Audit, whom did legal work for the City.  His wife, Cindy Roth, Riverside Chamber of Commerce, was taking taxpayer handouts to keep her organization afloat.  The question, if you need hand outs to sustain your business in the form of taxpayer subsidies, are you a good business?  The rest of us, true entrepreneurs or business people, must make it within the free market by our own perserverance or just dissolve.

TMC, RATED RIVERSIDE’S REGIONAL COUNTIES MOST, “NEGATIVE,” “RAUNCHY,” “LOW CLASS,” “VISIONS OF GRANDEUR,” “FULL OF B.S.,” “IGNORANT,” “MISGUIDED,” “BULLYISH,” “FILTHY,” “SICK,” “PERVERTED,” “DEFAMATORY,” “STUPID,” “PATHETIC,” “DESPICABLE,” “DISAPPOINTING,” “BELOW THE BELT,” “A NEW LOW,” “SHOCKING,” “OFFENSIVE,” “OBNOXIOUS,” “INAPPROPRIATE,” “HURTFUL,” “MEAN SPIRITED,” “DISTASTEFUL,” “EMBARRASSING,” HORIFFIC,” “SLANDEROUS” “FIT TO BE VIEWED FROM THE REAR” AND MEZZSPELLED, “MISSPELLED” AND “OPINIONATED” BLOG SITE!  YES WE ADMIT WE OUR ALL OF THAT AND MORE, WHICH IN CURRENT TERMS IS KNOWN AS “UNPOLITICALLY CORRECT.”  TEMPORARILY BLOCKED BY THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE AT PUBLIC ACCESS SITES WITHIN THE CITY, THEN UNBLOCKED.  I GUESS YOU CANNOT DO THAT ACCORDING TO THE ACLU.  RATED ONE TWO ONE STAR OUT OF FIVE IN TERMS OF COMMUNITY APPROVAL RATINGS..  … AGAIN, THANK YOU COMMUNITY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE EMPLOYEE’S FOR YOUR SUPPORT!  CONTACT US:  thirtymilescorruption@hotmail.com

 12510496_10207741708877187_9215059899072541863_n

CITY MANAGER RUSSO IS IN THE DRIVERS SEAT….HOW SAFE DO YOU FEEL?

jones_RUSSO-copy-620x465

Our Fugacious, City Manager Mr. Russo and Assistant City Manager Marianna wrote an editorial about the current state of  “Fiscal Reckoning”, in the City of Riverside. He was trying to defuse the message that the city is going down the path of bankruptcy.  I think Mr. Russo needs to leave the messaging to the professionals. His office is only making it worse and more obvious. You can read the full article on the Press Enterprise.

Who are the Perennial Critics or should I say who are the Truth Tellers. Me Vivian Moreno, Dvonne Pitruzzello, Raychelle Sterling, Jason Hunter, Kevin Dawson, Karen Wright, Marilyn Whitney, Aurora Chavez, Scott Simpson and my man Javier Moreno, we all work really hard and our motivation is to protect the underserved, disabled, elderly, and the  taxpayer/ ratepayer from bad decision making at city hall that will ultimately raise taxes and our utility bills.

Because I was referred to in this article I needed to answer or clarify the statements that were made. We took out all the fat or unnecessary verbiage and just left in the substance.

The city of Riverside has enjoyed financial success in the past decade, most notably through the on-time and on-budget delivery of the nearly $2 billion Riverside Renaissance capital improvement program. The city rode out the Great Recession with grace. By Borrowing or Stealing (depending who you ask) from Riverside Public Utilities, Water fund, Sewer fund, Electric fund, Workmans comp.fund, and the Rate Payer. Now, the city is in a “Fiscal Reckoning of this magnitude”, those are your words Mr. Russo not ours.

That success, however, was partially due to budgeting practices that are no longer sustainable. Whether it was borrowing from other funds to prop up the city’s General Fund. Why would the General fund have to be propped up? Our General fund cannot function without the propping up by Riverside Public Utilities…..REALLY BIG MISTAKE!

There is nothing ethically wrong with these practices, NO… IT”S JUST PLAIN STUPID, and they are certainly not illegal.  Depending on who you ask.  Indeed, many cities employ some variation of such budgeting practices, and Riverside could have continued doing so for many years without encountering serious financial difficulties.  Just like the city of Bell.

However, reliance on such practices is not sustainable over the long term, and goes against the principles of prudence and conservatism in municipal budgeting.  First you say we could have continued down this path for many years and now you say it’s unsustainable, WHAT? You sound like a crooked politician, maybe you should elaborate on (long term) and (many years).

The city’s new administration has spent several months working to institute the kind of fiscal discipline required to generate healthy and sustainable budgets well into the future.  This process has been difficult at times for everyone involved.  A $1 million surplus projected for fiscal year 2015-16 – built on the type of budgeting we should no longer allow – has morphed into a shortfall of about $8 million. This shortfall, if not corrected with sustainable ongoing measures, will result in a $10-12 million budget hole in fiscal year 2016-17.

While the projected deficit numbers may seem scary, they are not surprising – the city has had an expenditure problem for years. The very smart Perennial Critics recognized a expenditure problem years ago. The Council, over the last 10 years voted yes to all the expenditures. No one was listening to the very smart citizens who saw the writing on the wall. BUMMER!

All city departments will recommend cuts to the council, and, while it is management’s intent to minimize service reductions, those impacts are probably unavoidable in the face of a fiscal reckoning of this magnitude. Why? Because the only effective budgeting tool available to the council is service cuts; in California, most revenue increases require voter approval.  Are you going to cut the contracts for Government Entertainment? I can answer that NO! So let’s get this perfectly clear the Citizens have their services cut but we the citizens continue to pay for Government Entertainment. Most of the citizens of Riverside will never have the opportunity to afford to go to the Fox Theatre but they will still have to pay for it! We lose Police and Fire but we keep Rusty’s buddy.. Live Nation….REALLY! Is this because your band, Mr. Russo will be the ongoing featured act headlining at the FOX..It usually is self serving isn’t it!

Moreover, Riverside will now pass its budget within the context of a five-year financial plan.

This approach to municipal budgeting is bound to find more potential issues that demand attention.

As we hold ourselves to a higher budgetary standard, The real challenge John and Marianna is to wean the general fund off the RPU gravy train.

Unfortunately, some perennial critics of the city have confused the cure (early diagnosis of future budget challenges) with the disease (a negative imbalance between ongoing expenses and ongoing revenue). These folks have been frightening some Riversiders by proclaiming loudly that the city faces imminent bankruptcy. It’s amazing to me that we are labeled critics when all we ask for is the truth. When you make truthful statement like “Fiscal Reckoning, and while the projected deficit numbers may seem scary, they are not surprising,” these statements scare the folks. Even though you are in the driver seat Mr. Russo we will still demand the truth.

Let us state unequivocally that the city of Riverside is not going bankrupt; in fact, the city could have continued on its prior path for many years without suffering financial doom. But we believe that our standard should be higher than the very “low bar” of “just don’t go bankrupt.” We are committed to a rational budget in which ongoing revenue meets ongoing expenses, and long-term capital needs, like road repair and tree trimming, are properly covered.  Mr. Russo you cannot unequivocally state that the city is not going bankrupt. When you say the city need to be propped up. That sounds as dumb as Mike Gardner saying there were pots of gold.  We could not exist without the propping up of public utilities.

pot-of-gold

You also state very clearly in this editorial that, budgeting practices are no longer sustainable, We are experiencing a Fiscal Reckoning of this magnitude, projected deficit numbers may seem scary, and Residents and business owners may hear things that make them uncomfortable, and perhaps even a bit nervous about Riverside’s financial health. You can lay it out any way you like but what the critics are absolutely sure about 100% is that the life line to the General Fund is Public Utilities. The General Fund needs to be propped up. This is a scary situation to be in. We are one legal challenge away from a disaster….. BANKRUPT! That’s the truth.

As Riverside moves through weeks of introducing, refining and, ultimately, approving a budget for fiscal years 2016-17 and 2017-18, there will be some bumps in the road. Residents and business owners may hear things that make them uncomfortable, and perhaps even a bit nervous about Riverside’s financial health.  Mr. Russo you can make your case to the public any way you like, but there will be no new rate increases or new taxes. I can assure you of that. BRING IT ON!

We encourage everyone in Riverside to attend the council’s budget hearings or go to EngageRiverside.com to let us know what you think and be a part of that solution. Together, we will ensure that our city’s great past will be honored by an even greater future built upon sound and secure finances. What a joke! sound and secure finances were built on the backs of the RATE payers, overcharging and bilking Riverside Public Utilities has been going on for over a decade. The City Council is responsible for this entire fiasco. THEY OWN IT! The Perennial Critics encourage everyone to attend.

John A. Russo is Riverside city manager; Marianna Marysheva-Martinez is assistant city manager.

NOW FOR A LITTLE MUSIC TO SOOTHE THE SAVAGE BEAST…

VOTE VIVIAN MORENO MAYOR 2016, DON’T FORGET THE DEBATE TOMORROW NIGHT APRIL 28TH AT THE STRATTON CENTER (7:00PM TO 8:30PM), BORDWELL PARK, 2008 MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD., RIVERSIDE.

According to RivPublic, anonymous contributor to Thirty Miles of Corruption, “And about Russo, the man rocks! Can play the electric guitar and keyboard (and kinda sing??). Maybe he could pull a rabbit out of his hat and find some $$$$ too!”

TMC, RATED RIVERSIDE’S REGIONAL COUNTIES MOST, “NEGATIVE,” “RAUNCHY,” “LOW CLASS,” “VISIONS OF GRANDEUR,” “FULL OF B.S.,” “IGNORANT,” “MISGUIDED,” “BULLYISH,” “FILTHY,” “SICK,” “PERVERTED,” “DEFAMATORY,” “STUPID,” “PATHETIC,” “DESPICABLE,” “DISAPPOINTING,” “BELOW THE BELT,” “A NEW LOW,” “SHOCKING,” “OFFENSIVE,” “OBNOXIOUS,” “INAPPROPRIATE,” “HURTFUL,” “MEAN SPIRITED,” “DISTASTEFUL,” “EMBARRASSING,” HORIFFIC,” “SLANDEROUS” “FIT TO BE VIEWED FROM THE REAR” AND MEZZSPELLED, “MISSPELLED” AND “OPINIONATED” BLOG SITE!  YES WE ADMIT WE OUR ALL OF THAT AND MORE, WHICH IN CURRENT TERMS IS KNOWN AS “UNPOLITICALLY CORRECT.”  TEMPORARILY BLOCKED BY THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE AT PUBLIC ACCESS SITES WITHIN THE CITY, THEN UNBLOCKED.  I GUESS YOU CANNOT DO THAT ACCORDING TO THE ACLU.  RATED ONE TWO ONE STAR OUT OF FIVE IN TERMS OF COMMUNITY APPROVAL RATINGS..  … AGAIN, THANK YOU COMMUNITY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE EMPLOYEE’S FOR YOUR SUPPORT!  CONTACT US:  thirtymilescorruption@hotmail.com

debategoeske

The definition for Liar: A person who tells lies.

Synonyms: fabricator, fabulist, fibber, prevaricator, storyteller.

Related Words: exaggerator, mythomaniac, calumniator, defamer, libeler, libelist, slanderer; perjurer; distorter, falsifier; equivocator, palterer; gossip, gossiper, talebearer; charlatan, cheat cheater, counterfeiter, cozener, deceiver, defrauder, dissembler, dissimulator, double-dealer, fraud, hustler, knave, mountebank, operator, pretender.

As the 2016 City of Riverside Mayoral Campaign unfolds, I am dumbfounded by all the storytelling that comes from Councilman Paul Davis.  As we fact check the fabrication of details he delivers to the public, we are perplexed by his continuous chatter that gets more meaningless over time.  Is he trying to hustle or confuse the public, and all the other candidates?

1. I stated Mr. Davis wanted to privatize trash haulers and he would give Burrtec the contract because Burrtec is a contributor to his campaign:  Paul Davis stated very clearly, he never received campaign contribution from trash haulers:  These documents state very clearly that he is receiving money from Cole Burr who happens to own Burrtec.  He also received tickets to the speedway.  Please look very closely to the entire 2015 campaign contribution and expenses.  You might find some other very interesting facts, such as who else owns Paul?

cb460two        cb460       cb700tickets

460 Davis (01-01-14 – 06-30-14)_R       460 Davis (01-01-15 – 06-30-15)_R       700 Davis, Paul (1-1-14 – 12-31-14)

2. I made a comment about the reduction in Police Officers.  Paul Davis stated that we are not cutting police officers, “no one is cutting officers.”  The Press Enterprise stated in a current article the City would be demoting Lieutenants to Sergents, in addition, we have 17 unfunded positions that we will be eliminating.  Maybe Mr. Davis doesn’t know what ‘cut’ means, let’s help him: to take away, detach, trim, reduce.

3. I explained to the public the budget cuts that will be made will affect the taxpayer, police, fire, streets, tree trimming etc.  I also explained that the intelligent leadership of our City exchanged ‘Public Safety’ for ‘Government Entertainment,’ and the Council will never cut Government Entertainment.  Paul just plain fibbed about the cuts to the Fox and the Convention Center.  He said they were going to cut to $300,000.  What the heck was he talking about?  He must have pulled the $300,000 figure out of his hat.  The contracts in place for the Fox and the Convention Center keep going up.  Each contract started at about $1.5 to $1.9 million dollars.

4. He keeps on exaggerating that Councilman Mike Soubirous and himself fought to cut the budget.  Paul Davis and Mike Soubirous voted YES to every budget increase there was.  Mike Soubirious in NOT endorsing Paul Davis for Mayor.  There is a reason for that!

Thirty Miles of Corruption can find countless times during the election process that Mr. Davis was deceiving the public.  Here are just 4 examples of the double-talking Councilman who wants to be your Mayor.  So far Davis has demonstrated that he is a bully and a distorter.  You decide which word or words effectively describes Paul Davis!  Vote 2016.

We are just going to call Davis “Lying Paul?”  And that’s a matter of a fact!

EVEN RUSTY BAILEY RECEIVED CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS FROM COLE BURR OWNER OF BURRTEC WASTE, BUT WASN’T QUITE SURE.

bailey460burrburrtec2015bailey460burr

TMC, RATED RIVERSIDE’S REGIONAL COUNTIES MOST, “NEGATIVE,” “RAUNCHY,” “LOW CLASS,” “VISIONS OF GRANDEUR,” “FULL OF B.S.,” “IGNORANT,” “MISGUIDED,” “BULLYISH,” “FILTHY,” “SICK,” “PERVERTED,” “DEFAMATORY,” “STUPID,” “PATHETIC,” “DESPICABLE,” “DISAPPOINTING,” “BELOW THE BELT,” “A NEW LOW,” “SHOCKING,” “OFFENSIVE,” “OBNOXIOUS,” “INAPPROPRIATE,” “HURTFUL,” “MEAN SPIRITED,” “DISTASTEFUL,” “EMBARRASSING,” HORIFFIC,” “SLANDEROUS” “FIT TO BE VIEWED FROM THE REAR” AND MEZZSPELLED, “MISSPELLED” AND “OPINIONATED” BLOG SITE!  YES WE ADMIT WE OUR ALL OF THAT AND MORE, WHICH IN CURRENT TERMS IS KNOWN AS “UNPOLITICALLY CORRECT.”  TEMPORARILY BLOCKED BY THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE AT PUBLIC ACCESS SITES WITHIN THE CITY, THEN UNBLOCKED.  I GUESS YOU CANNOT DO THAT ACCORDING TO THE ACLU.  RATED ONE TWO ONE STAR OUT OF FIVE IN TERMS OF COMMUNITY APPROVAL RATINGS..  … AGAIN, THANK YOU COMMUNITY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE EMPLOYEE’S FOR YOUR SUPPORT!  CONTACT US:  thirtymilescorruption@hotmail.com

 

April 11th debate held at La Sierra Hills High School: see the full debate with all the issues presented by clicking this link, which will connect you to the Riverside Neighborhood Partnership YouTube site.

Thirty Miles of Corruption declared Vivian Moreno was the clear winner of the 2nd debate.

1.Vivian Moreno, 2. Nancy Melendez, 3. Sally Martinez, a tie at number 4, Rusty Bailey and Paul Davis ….. FOR LYING.

1. Vivian Moreno: She’s the one with all the knowledge. She has all the facts and she connects with the crowd like no other candidate. She’s informed with all the issues and would be the reformer. She would be the ONLY candidate that will HONESTLY take care of the taxpayer.

2. Nancy Melendez: She is all about…..I’m not quite sure what shes about. Community and Transparancy? She says that in every comment but I can’t quite find the substance or direction to her message.

3. Sally Martinez : She’s cute and sweet, really doesn’t know much about the real issues and would have to be spoon fed all the information.

4. Mayor Rusty Bailey:  He’s in denial, and is running his campagin on the notion that he has been Fiscally Responsible.  Maybe he doesn’t read the newspaper, or doesn’t want to know we are having a budget melt down. Though Rusty Bailey is the ultimate cheer leader for the City, the Fit Fresh and Fun Mayor, is he spending so much time riding his bike that maybe he doesn’t know his administration has been falling apart, and has been fiscally irresponsible.  At the debates he looked uncomfortable, and was always trying to defend his record.  As Mayor he will continue to make the public believe that the City’s course is in the right direction, and then take us down the path of no return, with a smile and a prayer.

Bailey is not just in denial, he’s in total denial and will try to make everyone believe there are no problems in Riverside.  He wants us out of our cars, riding our bikes or walking downtown.  He minimizes all the budget issues as if they can simply go away by magic. He will never say we need to raise taxes, but he will in a heartbeat.  He always has. During this debate Rusty said he would reduce the mayors budget by $20,000.00.  I say to that, “BIG DEAL!”  He also stated he had the smallest budget at City Hall.  Well I can tell you he has the highest Mayor’s budget in the entire region of Riverside County.  He also has the largest staff.  At one point his budget reached almost one million dollars.  As a matter of fact, there is no other Mayor in this region that has their own budget.  The Mayor and Council combined total budget in Anaheim is $900,000.00

4. Paul Davis: He is the-matter-of-fact Candidate.  Every question he is asked he makes sure he states “and thats a matter of fact.”  Maybe Mr. Davis should do some fact checking before he speaks. One thing is for sure, he is in an all out war with the Mayor, they dislike each other terribly, and-that’s-a-matter-of-fact.  Council member Davis would be the ‘bait and switch’ Mayor, he’ll tell you one thing, then do another.  He is also taking the Bully Pulpit to new heights, what you see is what your going to get.  A BULLY!

Davis is also the false recognition candidate, he steals the credit from someone else’s hard earned success, as in the case of Mike Soubrious or the public.  Davis voted year after year on spending increases and budget increases.  The only time he has voted for the public is in the last couple of months when he started to campaign for mayor.  After fact checking the diversity question, Mayor Bailey was right, Davis was wrong, here is the Darlene Elliot’s attorney’s letter to the Mayor, with the corresponding finding by Riverside Deputy City Attorney Robert Hansen.  The incident did not include the Mayor. It was between Elliot and Kane.  Read the “CAT FIGHT” by thirtymilesofcorruption.com

elliotcase                      cityrespons

Complaint Letter from Law Offices of Danuta Tuszynska       Findings Letter from Robert Hansen

Why Honesty will win every debate:   When you stand for honesty, you believe in yourself and everything you represent. When you stand for honesty, everything you say carries the voice of credibility. But, when you’re dishonest, your soiled reputation will do the speaking for you.

Cat-Fight
Hit this nail on the head The only person who will have the cities best interest in her heart and soul is Vivian Moreno she has dedicated her life to fixing the city and its corruption and over spending. Lets see a person who really cares for Riverside in the Mayors seat  – Marilyn Whitney
 TMC, RATED RIVERSIDE’S REGIONAL COUNTIES MOST, “NEGATIVE,” “RAUNCHY,” “LOW CLASS,” “VISIONS OF GRANDEUR,” “FULL OF B.S.,” “IGNORANT,” “MISGUIDED,” “BULLYISH,” “FILTHY,” “SICK,” “PERVERTED,” “DEFAMATORY,” “STUPID,” “PATHETIC,” “DESPICABLE,” “DISAPPOINTING,” “BELOW THE BELT,” “A NEW LOW,” “SHOCKING,” “OFFENSIVE,” “OBNOXIOUS,” “INAPPROPRIATE,” “HURTFUL,” “MEAN SPIRITED,” “DISTASTEFUL,” “EMBARRASSING,” HORIFFIC,” “SLANDEROUS” “FIT TO BE VIEWED FROM THE REAR” AND MEZZSPELLED, “MISSPELLED” AND “OPINIONATED” BLOG SITE!  YES WE ADMIT WE OUR ALL OF THAT AND MORE, WHICH IN CURRENT TERMS IS KNOWN AS “UNPOLITICALLY CORRECT.”  TEMPORARILY BLOCKED BY THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE AT PUBLIC ACCESS SITES WITHIN THE CITY, THEN UNBLOCKED.  I GUESS YOU CANNOT DO THAT ACCORDING TO THE ACLU.  RATED ONE TWO ONE STAR OUT OF FIVE IN TERMS OF COMMUNITY APPROVAL RATINGS..  … AGAIN, THANK YOU COMMUNITY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE EMPLOYEE’S FOR YOUR SUPPORT!  CONTACT US:  thirtymilescorruption@hotmail.com

boysTWO

MAYOR RUSTY BAILEY, RPU GENERAL MANAGER GIRISH BALACHANDRAN AND CITY MANAGER JOHN RUSSO GIVE IT BACK!

OUR $200 MILLION THAT IS! THAT IS APPROXIMATELY $2000.00 EACH RIVERSIDE HOUSEHOLD!

The problem, for the record, isn’t having reserves, it’s having excessive reserves.  There is only one place those reserves can come from – excessive rates.  Every other excuse RPU gives is hogwash.  Is the current administration continuing to puppeteer the charade?  Evidently so.  Just when it appears you are progressively going forward two steps, you find yourself six steps back, progress continues to be steps away.  The truth of the matter is our staff and leadership continues to believe the words of Dewey, Cheatem and Howe. The daily task for the  staff at City Hall is to find creative ways to take more money from the taxpayer, through more fines, forfeitures and taxes.   The rate payers deserve better, and the taxpayers executive staff and leadership find it simpler to cover the truth, then to tell the truth.  We find these truths to be self evident by the decision made by council on March 22, 2016, by changing the rules to fit the crime.  The decision that was voted upon was not made in good faith.  It was made to cover the mistake of overcharging the ratepayers, and now gives RPU, by the power of the legislative body (especially Paul Davis, Candidate for Mayor who is a big part of the problem), to take control of those monies originally heisted by this department.  In the real world of the private sector, this would be a crime.

What you have here is a public agency who’s been caught with their hand in the cookie jar and refuses to admit it for fear of actually accepting responsibility.  They need to feel the publics’ wrath: they purposely accentuated the pain of the Great Recession on this community most vulnerable in order to curry favor and ensure job security.  It’s sick sociopathic behavior and cannot be tolerated.

CLOWNS TO THE LEFT OF ME, JOKERS TO THE RIGHT OF ME..JUST MORE OF THE SAME??

Maintaining a healthy, but relatively low level of reserves, ensures the public that RPU execs are running a tight ship and does not allow them to, “paper over,” problems of their own making.  A, “healthy,” level of reserves in my opinion (and consistent with industry averages would be about $90-135 million total – both water and electric), which of course means RPU should give back about $200 million, or $2000 per average customer. How would that suit you?

Ratepayers should be reminded that a reserve fund is for contingencies, not for ongoing maintenance and planned replacement of infrastructure. On going maintenance is already paid for via rates. Bonds are issued for replacements and new infrastructure because the costs must be bourne by the users over time (to that effect, RPU has issued hundreds of millions in bonds to replace infrastructure of the past 10 years, so there is a legitimate question of, “do we really need all this new spending?”).

Riverside’s current policy DOES NOT even allow for this money to be used for anything but contingencies. The infrastructure angle is a red herring thrown out there to distract customers from realizing they’ve been overcharged for a decade. The money needs to be disgorged from RPU and given back to the community from which it came. It was an illegal tax used to create a slush fund and maximize the amount of the general fund transfer to the city’s general fund, which paid for elected and administrator’s pet projects.

The unanimous vote to allow RPU to keep 100% of its slush fund is indefensible and clearly demonstrates the Riverside Council’s, “more government is always good,” philosophy.  Instead of $325 million, it could’ve been $325 billion, and they still would’ve rationalized some way to allow RPU to keep the community’s money despite our City Charter clearly not allowing these types of slush funds to be established.  The vote allows RPU to basically stuff the money under a mattress and be used to paper over management mistakes, funnel monies to special interests, and fritter away the rest on mostly unnecessary infrastructure. Now that they’ve gotten the “all’s clear” signal from the Council, RPU will more than likely move to raise rates in the next 2 years despite what was printed in a current PE article.  RPU continues to be the City’s piggy bank through which it overcharges its captive residents in the form of rates (only Council vote necessary) in lieu of ever having to raise taxes (public vote necessary). The City’s culture of covering-up misdeeds of its electeds and executives continues.

My friend Jerry has a very special message for RPU with reference to holding on to overcharged rates …please listen closely….

Was this clear RPU ?

This is a council which just agreed to change the rules of the game to fit the crime, but, just because you made the rules legal, doesn’t hide the fact that the monies attained by overcharging the ratepayers was done illegally, hence, should be appropriately returned.  For years RPU had been in violation of it’s existing policy prior to the March 2016 council changes, which an overrage of ratepayers monies were charged. I find it disparaging that the publics voice and reason are not given any legitimate value. Taxpayers are now beginning to feel by particular attitudes of certain individuals at council, that “residents should be seen, not heard.” It is disconcerting that the only language the city seems to respond to, or give any legitimacy to, is in the form of a law suit.

VOTE VIVIAN MORENO FOR MAYOR 2016!  SHE IS THE ONLY CANDIDATE TAKING CARE OF THE TAXPAYER.

 TMC, RATED RIVERSIDE’S REGIONAL COUNTIES MOST, “NEGATIVE,” “RAUNCHY,” “LOW CLASS,” “VISIONS OF GRANDEUR,” “FULL OF B.S.,” “IGNORANT,” “MISGUIDED,” “BULLYISH,” “FILTHY,” “SICK,” “PERVERTED,” “DEFAMATORY,” “STUPID,” “PATHETIC,” “DESPICABLE,” “DISAPPOINTING,” “BELOW THE BELT,” “A NEW LOW,” “SHOCKING,” “OFFENSIVE,” “OBNOXIOUS,” “INAPPROPRIATE,” “HURTFUL,” “MEAN SPIRITED,” “DISTASTEFUL,” “EMBARRASSING,” HORIFFIC,” “SLANDEROUS” “FIT TO BE VIEWED FROM THE REAR” AND MEZZSPELLED, “MISSPELLED” AND “OPINIONATED” BLOG SITE!  YES WE ADMIT WE OUR ALL OF THAT AND MORE, WHICH IN CURRENT TERMS IS KNOWN AS “UNPOLITICALLY CORRECT.”  TEMPORARILY BLOCKED BY THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE AT PUBLIC ACCESS SITES WITHIN THE CITY, THEN UNBLOCKED.  I GUESS YOU CANNOT DO THAT ACCORDING TO THE ACLU.  RATED ONE TWO ONE STAR OUT OF FIVE IN TERMS OF COMMUNITY APPROVAL RATINGS..  … AGAIN, THANK YOU COMMUNITY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE EMPLOYEE’S FOR YOUR SUPPORT!  CONTACT US:  thirtymilescorruption@hotmail.com

Long lorry with white truck and trailer on highway against blue sky. See my other best vans collection.

THE NEVER ENDING POLITICAL PICTURE…

LASIERRADEBATE

CAN YOU IMAGINE WHO WILL WIN?

CHAMBERDEBATEDECLARES

Thirty Miles of Corruption Declared Vivian Moreno the Clear Winner of The first Mayorial Debate Hosted by The Greater Riverside Chamber of Commerce.  Vivian Moreno was articulate, knew the issues and she was able to grab the attention of the room like no other candidate could.  It was exciting because you have four intelligent candidates, with four very different views of how they perceive the condition of our city and how they would carry us forward.  This is how we saw it.

1.Vivian Moreno,   2. Paul Davis ( He called out Bailey’s over inflated job stats!),    3.Rusty Bailey, and    4. Nancy Melendez.

Out of respect for the local news and their new owner we were first waiting for the Press Enterprise to come out with their story, which they finally did…….We felt this is a really big deal so we’ll cover it in true Thirty Miles style.. The press was there and prior to the event they did a short release for the Chamber notifying the public about the debate.  The public was a little upset that they had to pay $50.00 to attend.  Approximately 100 people participated.  Alicia Robinsons facebook post below.

RobinsonFBone                    RobinsonFBtwo

CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE

Thirty Miles was able to get a copy of Mrs. Moreno’s opening and closing Statement.  She relunctently gave it to us knowing what kind of news people we are, and with the cornucopia of unknown ghost writers we have:

MORENO’S OPENING STATEMENT:

Good Afternoon, my name is Vivian Moreno.  I have been married for 29 years to Dr. Javier Moreno.  We have two daughters and three grand children.  We are in the skin care business.  Six years ago I became very involved in local government, when I finally realized that government affected our life almost every day.  Whether it was paying business taxes, utility bills, property taxes, code enforcement issues, street sweeping.  Government is a part of our life everyday, whether you like or not.

I wanted to learn everything I could about the way the city of Riverside functioned, and after countless hours of research and thousands of dollars worth of public documents….I was shocked!

I went to City Council meetings almost every Tuesday to inform the Mayor and Council what their own documents said.  They ignored this information.  They instead ridiculed us, called us crazy and even called us names.  We were determined to take our message to the public, so we started our blog site, Thirtymilesofcorruption.com   A place where we could post documents and tell the story our way.  What we have learned is the negative impact of ignorance, arrogance and egos by our elected officials has changed our quality of life forever in Riverside.

Today we have a $256 million General Fund budget, that will grow by 5 to 10 million a year.  It has a $20 million dollar gap in it.  You have a new City Manager stating to the Press Enterprise, he “hopes” we can get out of this.  You have Councilman Paul Davis suggesting Finance was “cooking the books.”  Then you have Councilmember Mike Gardner saying there were “pots of gold” that would always appear.  We’re in trouble, the City of Riverside is in trouble, and as a community you have to ask yourself, “How much more money are you willing to pay to make our city whole again?”

MORENO’S CLOSING STATEMENT:

I am running for Mayor because our Government has failed the people of Riverside, the were NOT fiscally responsible with taxpayer money…. And there is  a total disconnect between the Community and the Government of Riverside… The Elected Officials and City Government have failed to recognize that “We The People” are in charge… And the Citizens of Riverside need to take their Government Back!

Our Elected Officials have Neglected and lied to the Community for years…

They’ve had total disregard for the Riverside Charter… the constitution of our city… and for the policies that were enacted by our Government and the Vote of the people….. For Special Interest, Campaign contributions, and Government Entertainment.

Riverside was once a leader in our Region.  Riverside used to be a proud, well run city that seemed to have the best interest of the public at heart.  This is no longer the case.

For the last 10 years the leadership of Riverside has been on a spending spree and has put the entire city in financial risk.  They stole from our future generations to pay for the present… The bulk of our debt was spent on Government Entertainment…..in 2 square miles of our City right here in Downtown,  The Fox Theater, This Convention Center, millions of dollars were spent on restaurants that went out of business, fancy sidewalks, and the purchase of buildings we didn’t need… Land was purchased that now sits empty.

And they are not done.  They’re going to come to the public again for more money for Downtown spending…

Another 100 million dollars, to expand this Convention Center, to help out the Discovery Cube Project, build a new Library, and build a new Police Station.

In 2013, the City Council unanimously approved 5000 high density housing units for Downtown as well.  The rest of the City will suffer because a great portion of all taxpayer money is being spent downtown.

Crime is up in all neighborhoods, our Police force is down by 30 officers.  Our community sidewalks need to be fixed, our streets need to get redone.  Trees need to be trimmed… we have no money to fix or repair publicly owned property.

As your Mayor, I will suspend all new spending until our General Fund Budget is cut and healthy…  I will make Riverside a proud, well run city that will have the best interest of the public at heart.  I will work for “WE THE PEOPLE…NOT, WE THE SPECIAL INTEREST.”

My name is Vivian Moreno, I respectfully ask for your vote because I am the right choice.  Thank-you for coming.

STORY CONTINUES…

Vivian was confident, Paul was ready to take on Rusty, Rusty was uncomfortable, and Nancy was….. Nancy.  The other two candidates were a NO SHOW.  There were about 7 questions asked:  The budget, Jobs, March JPA, Measure A and the Prosecutorial Issue, Veto Power, Colleges, and the quintessential Mayor question.

When asked about whether the candidates supported the  Measure A- Prosecutorial issue,  Vivian, Paul, and Nancy, said No,  Rusty very cautiously/ uncomfortably said Yes

Vivian Stayed on point with all the questions, had a great message and spoke to the people….. GIVE RIVERSIDE BACK TO THE COMMUNITY.

Paul challenged Rusty every chance he could.  Paul did have some really good points.  He had some insight that the others didn’t have.

Rusty just repeated many of the same stats from his State of the City Address.  He sounded robotic and repetitive.  Mayor Bailey is a seasoned politican he should have defended his record better.

Nancy Talked about the Community and transparency over and over again. It was like she had the same answer for every question.

This Mayor’s race will be interesting to watch, you have Vivian Moreno that will present the argument about how our Elected Officials have failed the Citizens of Riverside, you will have Rusty and Paul fighting it out over who was better at failing the Citizens of Riverside and Nancy, well, Nancy will talk about the Spanish Heritage Town, the Community and Transparency.  Thirty Miles needs to give a hot tip to Nancy.  The City of Riverside enacted, Voted on, Approved Unanimously, and Codified, the Sunshine Ordinance.  There is no other city in Riverside County more transparent than ours.  Transparency was the buzz word of the 2012 election…….Bankrupt/Broke is the buzz word for 2016.

I have to agree! Vivian Moreno hit the nail on the head, was articulate and revealed a great deal more, than most in the city are willing to admit, nor utter. She knows the facts and does not skirt the truth. Unlike Bailey who is more concerned with celebrity and special interests.
People need to wake up. Bailey has systematically set this city to circle the drain, following lockstep to Loveridge’s lead, with corrupt business practices, flagrantly ignoring our financial situation, unethical disregard for the city council, the residents, and our money. This is not high school people. A vote for Bailey is a vote for bankruptcy.  – Lisa Chow, TMC Commenter

The Next debate is Monday night at La Sierra High School , Come early don’t miss it.

LASIERRADEBATE

CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE

 TMC, RATED RIVERSIDE’S REGIONAL COUNTIES MOST, “NEGATIVE,” “RAUNCHY,” “LOW CLASS,” “VISIONS OF GRANDEUR,” “FULL OF B.S.,” “IGNORANT,” “MISGUIDED,” “BULLYISH,” “FILTHY,” “SICK,” “PERVERTED,” “DEFAMATORY,” “STUPID,” “PATHETIC,” “DESPICABLE,” “DISAPPOINTING,” “BELOW THE BELT,” “A NEW LOW,” “SHOCKING,” “OFFENSIVE,” “OBNOXIOUS,” “INAPPROPRIATE,” “HURTFUL,” “MEAN SPIRITED,” “DISTASTEFUL,” “EMBARRASSING,” HORIFFIC,” “SLANDEROUS” “FIT TO BE VIEWED FROM THE REAR” AND MEZZSPELLED, “MISSPELLED” AND “OPINIONATED” BLOG SITE!  YES WE ADMIT WE OUR ALL OF THAT AND MORE, WHICH IN CURRENT TERMS IS KNOWN AS “UNPOLITICALLY CORRECT.”  TEMPORARILY BLOCKED BY THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE AT PUBLIC ACCESS SITES WITHIN THE CITY, THEN UNBLOCKED.  I GUESS YOU CANNOT DO THAT ACCORDING TO THE ACLU.  RATED ONE TWO ONE STAR OUT OF FIVE IN TERMS OF COMMUNITY APPROVAL RATINGS..  … AGAIN, THANK YOU COMMUNITY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE EMPLOYEE’S FOR YOUR SUPPORT!  CONTACT US:  thirtymilescorruption@hotmail.com

morenopinkjpg

Vivian Moreno confronts City Council on her prediction for the future of Riverside.

UPDATE: 04.25.2016: Budget Problems?… feeling good to be vindicated about ‘crying wolf’ over the budget for the past several years?  So why would this new City Manager Russo mention “perennial critics” who are “frightening folks” with the talk of bankruptcy?  But at the same time he is NOT providing any solutions aside from his straight across the board cut of 5% to every department…….so let’s roll the time clock back to the Tyisha Miller days of the police department…..does he realize that’s what got this city in trouble on that shooting?   I think he needs to be made aware that the rest of us were here and will be here after he leaves.

opinion

Opinionjohnrusso04222016

Good job on transferring your crew from Oakland to the sleepy Southern California town of Riverside.  Wow! how did you do it? You even brought your band down under?

flambe copy

THE KEY IS TEMPERATURE AND GOOD QUALITY CALVADOS..

I found this recent story released by the Press Enterprise to be quite amusing.  For the record, TMC, Vivian Moreno, Dvonne Pitruzzello, Mary Shelton and many others had been talking about the over spending at City Hall for years.  We started investigating when the Finance Department was under the direction of the accounting legend,  former CFO Paul Sundeen. The Master of Manipulating the books. He would come to city council to tell the council and mayor how great our credit rating was. We were so disgusted, we knew otherwise, all you had to do was read their documents and follow the money.  What is quite sidesplitting in the PE article is that some council members were puzzled by how the city went from a budget that appeared balance in June 2015, to a deficit estimated at $8 million in February 2016 (we believe the deficit is more like $19-25 million).  The response that hit the jugular was that one council member asked the question whether officials had manipulated the numbers.

But City Manager John Russo, stated in the PE that he thinks the problem in not malfeasance, but outdated systems of practices…well alrighty now, should his answer be taken at face value or seriously?  But he goes on to say, “I don’t think there was malicious intent there; I think the attitude was, ‘This is the way we’ve always done it.'”  He went on to say, “They won’t be doing it that way anymore.” Mr. Russo don’t we pay you to know?  Maybe we should hire another consultant to find out for sure?  OH, we can’t afford it!

I have to say that there is only one way which comes to accounting practices, and that is the right way, it’s called BEST PRACTICES.  But, I ask the question, as myself with a science background.  There are many statistical applications that can be utilized to receive a favorable or desired result.  Is this what happened?

What is more disparaging is that the City will not comment on the reasons for Mason’s departure, which leaves a bad taste in my mouth, because what they are doing is not being upfront with the facts and being transparent. I thought Mr. Russo was all about transparency?   We the taxpayer, the CEO, the Employer, needs to know what is going on with our company…our City!

Mr. Russo again sugar coats everything and will hold no one accountable for the misdeeds that occurred in our city.  He has so far found that the City officials did not follow policy in the City Attorneys Office or Finance Department.  Former City Attorney Greg Priamos paid his friends by issuing no contracts and therefore was no accountability.  Russo has now dismantled the Finance Department for what is believed,  as “cooking the books.”  Brent Mason, Michael Gomez and Scott Catlett are GONE!  I think Human Resources is next.  I’m sure all the Department heads are looking for new jobs.

Thirty Miles of Corruption started receiving the news of Brent’s departure about a month ago from an anonymous source who sometimes appears to be wholly inadequate…  Vivian Moreno was at the RRR neighborhood meeting March 7th, she asked John Russo very specifically if Brent Mason was leaving and are we headed for BANKRUPTCY?  He stated “He could not respond to personal issues, but the Finance Department is wholly inadequate for an organization I am in charge of.”   As far as the bankruptcy issue he would not really elaborate but basically said “no!”  Do I believe him? NO!

When Councilmember Mike Gardner states “There’s always this magic pot of gold that appears,” common sense will tell there is no pot of gold, there is no magic money, and there is no money tree. The Councilmembers were so stupid they actually believed there was a pot of gold?   Now you have Assistant City Manager Marianna stating the imbalances were disguised?  We do not live in the Emerald Green Land of OZ either.  We live in Riverside.  They were STEALING from Riverside Public Utilities.  The City always spent way more than what was budgeted.  It was a ticking time bomb..

THERE IS NO MAGIC MONEY….. why do I say that?  The City of Riverside magically found 10 million dollars to pay off our Prop 218 lawsuit.  The $10 million was to be paid from the General Fund back to the Water Fund.  The creative finance people seemingly found the money?  More pots of gold?  Or is this the straw that breaks the camels back.  I suggest all you really smart council people check to see how legal that was, to take the magic money the way you approved it.  Let me give you a very simple explanation, we tax retail, “YES!”  We tax wholesale, “NO!”  Council approved a wholesale tax… “STUPID!”  Again, there is no Magic Money…..there was no real payment from the general fund of $10 million.  You had electric pay water.  Let me explain that to you even easier. You had the Electric Ratepayer pay the Water Ratepayer.

Paul Davis stated they were ‘cooking the books’… Mike Gardner believes there was no wrong doing, Mike Gardner also believes in pots of gold… Who do you believe?  The Council is ultimately responsible for the disguising, cooking, and lying about the true financial position of the city.

City Manager John Russo stated the Finance Department was wholly inadequate.  Mr. Russo, we think Former Mayor Ron Loveridge, Cindy Roth, Brad Hudson, Scott Barber, Michael Beck, Paul Sundeen, Scott Catlett, Brent Mason, Tom Desantis, Belinda Graham, Deanna Larson, Mayor Rusty Bailey, Chris MacArthur, Mike Gardner, Steve Adams, Andy Melendrez, Paul Davis, Jim Perry, Nancy Hart, and all the special interest groups and citizens that supported and benefited from all the wild spending, were wholly inadequate and responsible for the current financial mess we are in.

Council member mike Gardner sums it up by stating ” The old way has hurt the city.”

The Old way hasn’t hurt the City Mr. Gardner….. The Mayor and Council did….. and you did!

UPDATE: 03.21.2016: CITY OF RIVERSIDE NAMES SCOTT MILLER NEW INTERIM FINANCE DIRECTOR.

UPDATE: 04.18.2016: FORMER CITY OF RIVERSIDE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER BRENT MASON CHOSEN TO BE CFO FOR THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO.

 

VOTE MORENO FOR RIVERSIDE MAYOR 2016!

TMC, RATED RIVERSIDE’S REGIONAL COUNTIES MOST, “NEGATIVE,” “RAUNCHY,” “LOW CLASS,” “VISIONS OF GRANDEUR,” “FULL OF B.S.,” “IGNORANT,” “MISGUIDED,” “BULLYISH,” “FILTHY,” “SICK,” “PERVERTED,” “DEFAMATORY,” “STUPID,” “PATHETIC,” “DESPICABLE,” “DISAPPOINTING,” “BELOW THE BELT,” “A NEW LOW,” “SHOCKING,” “OFFENSIVE,” “OBNOXIOUS,” “INAPPROPRIATE,” “HURTFUL,” “MEAN SPIRITED,” “DISTASTEFUL,” “EMBARRASSING,” HORIFFIC,” “SLANDEROUS” “FIT TO BE VIEWED FROM THE REAR” AND MEZZSPELLED, “MISSPELLED” AND “OPINIONATED” BLOG SITE!  YES WE ADMIT WE OUR ALL OF THAT AND MORE, WHICH IN CURRENT TERMS IS KNOWN AS “UNPOLITICALLY CORRECT.”  TEMPORARILY BLOCKED BY THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE AT PUBLIC ACCESS SITES WITHIN THE CITY, THEN UNBLOCKED.  I GUESS YOU CANNOT DO THAT ACCORDING TO THE ACLU.  RATED ONE TWO ONE STAR OUT OF FIVE IN TERMS OF COMMUNITY APPROVAL RATINGS..  … AGAIN, THANK YOU COMMUNITY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE EMPLOYEE’S FOR YOUR SUPPORT!  CONTACT US:  thirtymilescorruption@hotmail.com