CLICK IMAGE OF LETTER TO ENLARGE
According to the letter signed off by Assistant City Manager Deanna Lorson, John Brandriff’s complaint was valid. Chief of Police Sergio Diaz was found to be guilty of “Discourtesy”. Well yes, we thought it was more of being a “Threat.” Remember, Diaz was threatening Brandriff’s political career, and for good measure, he went on to question Brandriff’s manhood! Which these actions seem to be very different from the terms “misconduct” or “poor service.” The actual finding states, that the department member committed all or part of the alleged acts of misconduct or poor service. Sorry this just doesn’t seem to describe the threat to end one’s political career or the justification to tell Brandriff that he should grow some balls and talk to him. Should we add professionalism to this? It just goes on to sound as a simple man, with a badge, a gun, power, ego and a preoccupation with men’s balls. Is this just another L.A. West Side story? The next question is how CM Scott Barber will handle this case. Remember, the Chief does not take criticism well, according to many in the community that have dealt with him. Will this be a slap on the wrist, a write up or a course in Anger management?
Did I get that right Serge…What? Was that a thumbs up?
REMEMBERING THOSE THIS JUNE 6 WHO FOUGHT ON THE SHORES OF NORMANDY, FRANCE IN 1944:
AMERICAN CEMETERY NORMANDY, FRANCE
CITY RIVERSIDE SUES REGISTRAR OF VOTERS TO BLOCK LEGAL MARIJUANA BALLOT MEASURE! AS IF THE CITY HAS THE MONEY TO DO SO…
According to the Press Enterprise, of which I believe TMC is blocked from the PE for some reason from commenting… At the direction of the Riverside City Council a lawsuit was filed to block the Registrar of Voters office from placing a legal marijuana initiative on the ballot! But is this really legal, the basis of the City’s argument is that it is illegal. Okay I give you that, according to Federal Law Marijuana is in a CI classification under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) (21 U.S.C. § 811), therefore marijuana is classified as a Schedule I drug, which means that the federal government views marijuana as highly addictive and having no medical value. Yes Marijuana is illegal according to Federal Law, but so is Illegal Immigration, where are they on that stand? Doctors may not “prescribe” marijuana for medical use under federal law, though they can “recommend” its use under the First Amendment. But why does are little ol City Attorney Greg Priamos feel he can go out of his jurisdiction to pull a legal block, which in essence is a Federal issue? Yes, this is a federal issue and Priamos should know that, and call the Feds to take over. The Feds in general are currently taking a back seat on the marijuana issue. Just the fact that Priamos thinks that he can put an end to the legal voting process, is at least, goes against everything in which this country was built on. Blocking the will of the people is a very dangerous position to take regarding those in City Council to take. This leads to the question of what other voting issues have the City gone against in favor of their own agenda. One comes to mind, the use of taxpayer monies for Yes on Measure A campaign. Was that a Federal issue also? Now we are getting somewhere. Greg, you don’t own this City, State or Country, quit spending taxpayer monies on frivolous law suits when the City is having difficulty paying their debt service.
City Attorney, Gregory Priamos
Priamos should also have know that it is illegal to enter into outside legal help without contracts, also for illegal water monies transferred in violation of Proposition 218, for bond fraud, for redevelopment money improprieties, for faulty legal advice to counsel, for the code rehab property scam, for using taxpayer monies to pay for parties etc. etc.
In a time when the City of Riverside is having difficulty paying it’s debt service, thanks to former City Manager Brad Hudson, this initiative would tax and regulate a small number of dispensaries within the City. Tax money gained from the sale can help the city with it’s debt service, instead of attempting to increase the residents utility rates again, and again. This certainly is a reflection of how our City views it’s voting constituents.
HYATT OWNER METRO RIVERSIDE FILES CHAPTER 11 TO CIRCUMVENT THE CITY’S FORECLOSURE PROCESS! The City of Riverside filed foreclosure proceeding on the newly constructed Hyatt Hotel. Originally the hotel was built by money loaned to Sivash Barmand, who owned the San Francisco based company, Metro Pacific properties, to the tune of approximately $20 million. Barmand, who does business in the City of Riverside as MetroRiverside, defaulted on their agreement by allowing their reserve fund fall below the required balance. This is just the beginning, as a cascade of surprises unveils itself as a result of Mayor Bailey’s moral compass, former City Manager Brad Hudson. Not long ago the Hyatt was in court claiming the City was attempting to “extort” them! What now Councilman Mike Gardner, this was on your watch! This was our story back in October of 2012.
UPDATE: 10/26/2012: THE DEVELOPER OF THE HILTON TO SUE THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE.. WITHIN THE CONTRACT, IF THE DEVELOPER DEFAULTS, THE CITY IS NOW IN THE “HOTEL BUSINESS.” FOR THIS TRANSACTION, TWO FIRESTATIONS AND TWO LIBRARIES ARE USED AS COLLATERAL..
(HYATT PIC COURTESY OF TRIP ADVISOR)
IS THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE INVOLVED IN “EXTORTION” AS CLAIMED BY HYATT DEVELOPER?
According to the Press Enterprise, a story broke by City Council Gadlflies almost a year ago, no one listened, because they may have thought they were simply “crazy” made mention to the contract between the City of Riverside and the Developer Siavash Barmand. The other claim states that the city “extorted” money from MetroRiverside by improperly changing the obligations to build public improvements, and by delaying approval of designs for the improvements. The claims say the developer lost money because of the design approval delay and the convention center closure.
I’m surprised the City didn’t code it to death, then rehab it at a profit.
TMC, RATED RIVERSIDE’S MOST “SLANDEROUS” AND MEZZSPELLED, “MISSPELLED” AND “OPINIONATED” BLOG SITE! TEMPORARILY BLOCKED BY THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE AT PUBLIC ACCESS SITES WITHIN THE CITY, THEN UNBLOCKED. I GUESS YOU CANNOT DO THAT ACCORDING TO THE ACLU. RATED ONE TWO ONE STAR OUT OF FIVE IN TERMS OF COMMUNITY APPROVAL RATINGS.. TMC IS NOW EXCLUSIVLY EXCLUSIVELY ON FILE WITH THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE’S DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE (WE BELIEVE THIS WILL END SOON, SINCE THE FOCUS IS NOW ON THE IMPROPRIETIES OF MR. “Z”, WE TRIED TO TELL YOU, BUT NOBODY LISTENED), AND DON’T FORGET WE ARE PROSSIBLY POSSIBLY ON FILE WITH THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE’S POTENTIAL SLAPP SUIT LIST… A STRATEGIC LEGAL MANEUVER THAT CAN BE DONE ONLY IN RIVERSIDE WITHOUT A CONTRACT, WE WILL HAVE TO ASK GREGORY ABOUT THAT ONE ( OUR PEOPLE WILL HAVE TO CONTACT HIS PEOPLE)… AGAIN, THANK-YOU COMMUNITY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE EMPLOYEE’S FOR YOUR SUPPORT! COMMENTS ALWAYS WELCOMED, ESPECIALLY SPELL CHECKERS! WE JUST CAN’T SPELL! EMAIL ANONYMOUSLY WITH YOUR DIRT BY CONTACTING US AT: THIRTYMILESCORRUPTION@HOTMAIL.COM
The Hyatt’s foreclosure was inevitable given that Metro Riverside had no experience with a capital project this size, that they couldn’t secure private financing and that the foreclosure rate in the IE was the highest in state. This should have been anticipated at the subcommittee level but it wasn’t. The city instead loaned the money and then secured the bonds.
The city used fire stations 13 and 14 (the newest such facilities at the time) and Casa Blanca and Arlington’s libraries (the two that underwent most recent renovations) as collateral on bonds despite advice not to put our public resources at risk. They were warned nine months ahead of the Hyatt suit that likely Metro Riverside would file a TRO/injunction for relief which would allow them to stop making payments on their city loan. That happened and the city found itself mired in litigation at public expense.
Now we’re in the inevitable position of owning a hotel in foreclosure and having to find someone to take conservatorship of it. . Then make the bond payments to keep our city properties from being seized by the bond agent. It’s too bad it came to this but it wasn’t something that couldn’t have been anticipated ahead of time. Sometimes listening to constituents is a helpful pastime.
As far as Diaz, well not exactly surprising. But hopefully the third time will be the charm.
[…] BRANDRIFF NOT BRANDRIFFING AROUND: CHIEF OF POLICE SERGIO DIAZ FOUND TO BE DISCOURTEOUS! […]
[…] BRANDRIFF NOT BRANDRIFFING AROUND: CHIEF OF POLICE SERGIO DIAZ FOUND TO BE DISCOURTEOUS! […]