Author Archive

LETTERONE   LETTERTWO   LETTERTHREE

CLICK THIS LINK TO VIEW LETTER SENT TO ALL CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR

The letter above was sent by the City Employees Association (CEA) in care of the Moreno Valley Management Association (MVMA), a group of approximately 72 mid-level managers.  Current Board Members of the MVMA are President Felicia London, Vice-President Shanikqua Watkins and Treasurer John Kerenyi.  The letter expresses their concerns about a certain volunteer, Vivian Moreno, which Mayor Jessie Molina accepted to work with him as a legislative aide a mere few months ago.    If you read the letter carefully you will see it focuses on the City Managers office, which is not a member of this organization.

In the city of Riverside, Vivian Moreno has been known to the community for years as a City watchdog and an advocate for the taxpayer, having spent two years along with a group of other active citizens in Riverside learning municipal financing and understanding how to read city documents.  She was successful in suing the city of Riverside on behalf of its utility ratepayers for Prop 218 violations and returning 10 million dollars back to the water utility.  Along with Dvonne Pitruzzello, Errol Koschewitz, Marilyn Whitney and many others, after 6 long years activists exposed the AG Park incident for residents taken ill by toxins.  Currently, AG Park has now been taken over by the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC), the Evironmental Protection Agency (EPA) and our very dear friend Penny Newman through her organization.  The residents of Ag park are finally in good hands. Vivian Moreno along with some of her very special friends have been instrumental in reshaping and redirecting the City of Riverside.

Many cities have legislative aides. The city of Riverside, with a population of 300,000 has legislative aides in order to help Councilmembers be efficient and effective.  City of Riverside’s Mayor William “Rusty” Bailey has a Mayor’s budget of close to 1 million dollars and several staff at his disposal.  The city of Moreno Valley has a population of 200,000 and have never had legislative aides or a Mayor’s staff.  Mayor Jesse Molina’s budget is zero.  In order for California cities to progress to the next level, legislative aides are necessary.  Moreno Valley is not a, “one horse town,” anymore.  If they want to be an economic contender in competition as the world logistics’ arena, they will need more employees at the legislative end in order to properly project the city into the future, as the city moniker states, “The City That Soars…”

With this in mind it is rather remarkable that the MVMA in conjunction with the CEA would attempt to take the city down by focusing on a volunteer to the Mayor. Why is that? Why the concern? Why the attempt to discredit, slander and libel this one volunteer? A volunteer who has worked for Mayor Jessie Molina without pay for two months on her own time.  Some ask, “What is her agenda?” to which we reply, “None, except for the fact that in every city, taxpayers need protection from those with unscrupulous motives.”

The focus of the letter quickly becomes focused upon the executive staff.  We ask, “Are they there to protect and serve the Mayor and Council, or are they there to primarily serve themselves?”  One of the biggest issues in Moreno Valley is retrieving public documents.  Documents don’t lie, which is why we often post them here.  If documents are difficult to retrieve, we have to ask ourselves, “Why?”  The difficulty in acquiring documents within the required time period required by the California Public Records Act makes a municipality look suspicious.

The first thing we noticed about the letter was that no one appeared to want to take responsibility for the claims in it – it’s unsigned and without a printed name.  Was someone afraid or was it simply an oversight? If there was a problem at the employee and management level. where was Chris Paxton, Administrative Services Director, aka Human Resources?  It would seem that city policy would direct an employee to contact the HR department first.  Has the CEA taken the place of the Human Resource Department liason?  If so, what does Paxton really do?

Our attorney called the CEA, and spoke specifically with Director Robin Nahin.  Nahin was told that the letter was not signed.  Nahin replied that the letter should have been signed by someone from the board of MVMA.  What’s quite remarkable is the letter at the bottom, has a line, where a signature should be, with the CEA as the responsible party.  Secondly, the letter is written on CEA letterhead.  There is nowhere on the letter that addresses the inference of a signature referencing the MVMA.  Befuddled? Your guess is as good as ours.  As we understand, before a letter such as this was sent to the City, there should have been a notification process to all members of the MVMA by board members.  Then a vote by members of the MVMA in order for the letter to move forward to the Council.  We are trying to find the the minutes of this meeting.

CEA’s Robin Nahin seemed to have her own set of problems in the past as indicated in this SEIU video.  By the way Nahin is not an attorney.

Looking more into this Union/Association we find more inconsistencies.  Teamsters Union actually challenged CEA as a real Union, the following video exposes the real City Employees Association according to Director Robin Nahin!

According to the Arcadia Patch, Nahin become involved in a suit filed by Attorney Wendell Phillips. Phillips who consults for the Arcadia Public City Employees Association (APCEA) and, until his break with Nahin, did work for the City Employees and Public Works associations—accused Nahin of choosing a “path of least resistance” as her approach to salary negotiations in order to minimize company time spent on clients.

TMC’s investigative team contacted Attorney Wendell Phillips and he told us that… Sunshine Kills Fungus, Just Shine the Light On It!  Wendell Phillips also gave us a quick lesson on Robin Nahin and CEA.  Just watch the videos and you can figure this out for yourself. Its really not that difficult!  Phillips also stated of the CEA, “You get what you pay for.”

What is also quite remarkable is that according to the PE,  Councilwoman LaDonna Jempson (a Human Resources professional no less) said she’s concerned about the letter.  “Employees have a right to work in a peaceful work environment,” Jempson said, “and it’s up to Molina to defuse a situation that could be costly if the city is ever sued.”  We’re a bit taken back that a Human Resources professional would assume that the letter is valid without appropriately suggesting an investigation of the complaints first.  Further, we find it odd that she did not check with Human Resource Director Chris Paxton, to see if the complainants initially contacted him before contacting CEA.  As a Human Resource professional she didn’t find it odd that the complaint or issue was not taken to HR, as with most City policies?

Jempson also found it necessary to make a personal attack by pointing out that Mayor Molina has an ego problem.  “I’m hoping maybe he’ll move his ego out of the way and make a logical, sensible decision based on what is best for the city,” Jempson said. “The best thing for the city would be to move Ms. Moreno out of that position.”  At the WLC meeting, Jempson made it known publicly that we as a community need to begin to get along.  Maybe she should practice what she preaches.  TMC suggests that she move her ego out of the way and make logical, sensible statements based on what is best for the city.  The public knows when you are just dishing up lip service.  I wonder if Mrs. Jempson noticed that the letter was not signed?

We also find it quite interesting that a former City Councilmember Richard Stewart was contacted for comment.  It was probably easy finding him at his usual hang out.  We all know where that is, right?  (Hint: correct answer pays 3 to 2)  But current council members, Dr. Yxstian Gutierrez, Jeff Giba or George Price were not contacted for comment.

Moreno Valley has a contract with the Moreno Valley City Employees Association as indicated below:

MVCEAone

MOU-MVCEA2015-2017

Their contract is signed by both the CEA and MVMA as indicated below:

MVMA   MVMAsigned

MOU-MVMA2015-2017

Who are those behind the writing of this letter?  According to the letter itself, the focus appears to be on the City Manager’s Office, which is mentioned numerous times, and it’s relationship with Council and Mayor.  With this in mind, it leads one to ask the question, “Shouldn’t the City Manager, Michelle Dawson, know what is going on under her nose?”  According to the PE, she knew nothing about the letter prior to receiving it.  I would imagine that at least MVMA President Felicia London, the city of Moreno Valley’s Management Analyst would know, but she declined to comment.  Julie Reyes declined to comment.  CEA Director, Robin Nahin declined to comment.  No one knows anything!

Shouldn’t there be a friendly relationship between City Manager Michelle Dawson and Chief Financial Officer Rick Teichert? Or is there already one. How about between Julie Reyes and Councilman George Price?  Bottom line is all should have good relationships with the Mayor.

But what is the real problem with City Hall in Moreno Valley?  Does the staff mploy a culture of misdirection? Is executive staff disengaged from their subordinates?  Or is it simply a disconnect between the legislative body and executive staff? An executive staff unable or unwilling to serve at the pleasure of those they claim loyalty to?  Is the foundation so broken that everyone may just simply need to be replaced?

“Fear is the foundation of most Governments…”       

– John Adams, 2nd President of the United States of America,  January 1776

HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT:

CEA and MVMA claims Moreno is causing a “hostile work environment.”  Last we checked, lawsuits over hostile workplaces must be based on hostility caused by individual discrimination against an employee based on, e.g., race, age, gender, disability, etc.  As Attorney Letitia Pepper said, criticizing someone for their personal conduct (e.g., using sexual favors to secure a promotion) or lack of ability (e.g., being unable to properly notice a meeting) does NOT constitute any unlawful conduct on the part of Moreno. The average person doesn’t realize that an UNLAWFUL, “hostile workplace environment,” can’t be based on criticism of an employee’s conduct –unless the criticism is (1) false and (2) motivated by the employee’s characteristics (e.g., race, age, gender, disability) — as opposed to his or her conduct.

One example of sexual harassment for instance is the hostile work environment it creates for co-workers.  A relationship between a supervisor and a subordinate can be troublesome. Favoritism arising out of a personal relationship is damaging to the whole department. Two major issues could arise, Conflict of Interest between the two and not enough time being spent on doing work assigned. Not to mention the target of office gossip in the blogosphere or elsewhere consuming the office dialog causing distractions. Wide spread favoritism, and nasty rumors can create a sexually hostile work environment. Employers face greater risk from a workplace romance. California Supreme Court rules that office affairs may give rise to sexual favoritism claims. {Miller v California Department of corrections} Employees in California may now sue their employers for sexual harassment if the sexual affair between a superior and a subordinate results in sexual favoritism. It is a Violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act.

“Sleeping her way to the top” was the basis of this lawsuit. Numerous women were romantically and sexually involved with their boss. Women got ahead and were promoted if they performed sexual favors for their supervisor. Preferential treatment, raises, promotions, company perks were all part of the repeated incidents of sexual favoritism. The outcome was a hostile work environment.  Sexual Favoritism sends a message to female/male employees that they must demean themselves by becoming sexual playthings in order to get ahead at work. In this particular case it was proven that “Boss’s favorable treatment of lovers can be harassment to others.”  Relationships between equals that effect other staff can also constitute a hostile work environment similar conditions exist.

Bottom line is work place relationship can hurt the taxpayers through the liabilities it creates.  She knows…

“The process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service,” Roosevelt wrote in 1937 to the National Federation of Federal Employees. Yes, public workers may demand fair treatment, wrote Roosevelt. But, he wrote, “I want to emphasize my conviction that militant tactics have no place” in the public sector. “A strike of public employees manifests nothing less than an intent on their part to prevent or obstruct the operations of Government.”  – Franklin D. Roosevelt, 32nd President of the United States

b70-8505

TMC, RATED RIVERSIDE’S MOST, “RAUNCHY,” “LOW CLASS,” “VISIONS OF GRANDEUR,” “FULL OF B.S.,” “IGNORANT,” “MISGUIDED,” “BULLYISH,” “FILTHY,” “SICK,” “PERVERTED,” “STUPID,” “PATHETIC,” “DESPICABLE,” “DISAPPOINTING,” “BELOW THE BELT,” “A NEW LOW,” “SHOCKING,” “OFFENSIVE,” “INAPPROPRIATE,” “HURTFUL,” “MEAN SPIRITED,” “DISTASTEFUL,” “EMBARRASSING,” HORIFFIC,” “SLANDEROUS” “FIT TO BE VIEWED FROM THE REAR” AND MEZZSPELLED, “MISSPELLED” AND “OPINIONATED” BLOG SITE!  TEMPORARILY BLOCKED BY THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE AT PUBLIC ACCESS SITES WITHIN THE CITY, THEN UNBLOCKED.  I GUESS YOU CANNOT DO THAT ACCORDING TO THE ACLU.  RATED ONE TWO ONE STAR OUT OF FIVE IN TERMS OF COMMUNITY APPROVAL RATINGS..   AGAIN, THANK YOU COMMUNITY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE EMPLOYEE’S FOR YOUR SUPPORT!

Let the Sunshine in……

 

Council represents the people’s will and voice and provides legislative oversight. Council is also the City’s chief policy maker and is therefore responsible to the people.

Government’s duty is to serve the public, reaching its decision in full view of the public. Commissions, boards, councils and other agencies of a City or County exist to conduct the people’s business…….AKA Sunshine Ordinance.

Riverside California is the latest City to join a very exclusive group of cities to adopt an open Government policy. Last Tuesday the City Council voted 6 to 1 to Codify the Sunshine Ordinance. The ordinance is meant to foster transparency in city government.
o CA Sunshine Ordinances: Contra Costa County
o CA Sunshine Ordinances: Berkeley
o CA Sunshine Ordinance: Milpitas
o CA Sunshine Ordinance: Oakland
o CA Sunshine Ordinances: Alameda
o CA Sunshine Ordinances: San Francisco
o CA Sunshine Ordinances: Riverside
o CA Sunshine Ordinances: Vallejo
o CA Sunshine Ordinances: Gilroy

The first city in California to adopt this ordinance was San Francisco, it took effect in 1994. The premise was that it is a way to hold city officials accountable. They also have a Sunshine Ordinance Task Force. The Task force had problems along the way. An 11-member volunteer citizen panel, appointed by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, enforces the ordinance. Since it took effect, 27 instances of serious violations requiring disciplinary action have been cited, according to the citizen panel, the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force. But those cases have been dismissed or moved into bureaucratic oblivion by the Ethics Commission, which is responsible for punishing sunshine violators.“The Ethics Commission doesn’t do anything,” said Allyson Washburn, a member of the task force. “They don’t enforce our orders of determination.” Without consequences for violations, Ms. Washburn said, the ordinance lacks teeth. Richard Knee, chairman of the task force, said the Ethics Commission was adversarial. As a result, the task force is trying to change the ordinance to limit the commission’s role and impose fines of up to $5,000 against city workers for violations, money that would be paid out of their own pockets. The change would require voter approval.
So the question is will the city of Riverside have a Sunshine Ordinance Task force?  Will the City of Riverside REALLY hold anyone accountable and will we impose fines on the people who violate our new ordinance? Only time will tell.

Most of the Sunshine jurisdictions are located in the greater Bay Area. They all grant quicker, cheaper and simpler access to public records than would otherwise be made available. The Cities that have adopted the open Government policy have taken years to draft, formulate, and implement the ordinance. Some cities took the policy to the vote of the people. The city of Berkley took 10 years and 24 drafts. San Jose took 4 years.

The City of Riverside hires a new city manager and we have a policy in less than 2 months, drafted by the new city attorney with no public involvement. This policy was rushed through faster than a speeding bullet. When this very important policy came before council only one council member had concerns about its content, Mike Soubirous.  He was the only council member to insist there be an exemption (with certain conditions) for council. He said it was in case council or a member needed to question or discuss policy/procedure BEFORE addressing an important issue.  In other words, he was concerned about the people’s voice being confined or stifled.  The Sunshine Ordinance was really designed to bring light to staff’s many proposals and approval requests – not hinder the people’s right to question things in a timely manner.  No one else on the council had anything intelligent to say about passing it.  The rest of the council blindly accepted what City Manager John Russo had to offer.  No questions, no concerns, nothing!  To think that a person appointed by the Council (City Manager) could propose a plan to his bosses (City Council) and that they (council) would blindly support a process that holds them to the very same rules he imposes on his staff is nothing short of amazing. No questions, no concern – except one lone councilman.  One would think that those we elect would fight to keep the power entrusted to them by the people in order to better represent them. Nope! No fight among 6 of 7.  John Russo learned that night that he owns at least five – maybe six of the council members. He learned that he can, and probably without any fight, get them to buy anything he sells them…

Thirty Miles of Corruption is all in favor of an Open Government policy, this policy is a way for citizens to have some accountability at city hall. We are just saying maybe the content should have been vetted in the public a little better, and maybe there should have been some public participation. We are not too concerned the policy can be amended. We found this great amendment to the Oakland California. Sunshine Ordinance, Mayor, now Governor Jerry Brown wasn’t too keen on following policy!

Ord12483OaklandSunshine Ordinance Amendment Oakland California

“Government operates best when Government operates in the open”, New City Manager John Russo is the GODFATHER of the Sunshine Ordinance. That’s how he rolls. He could probably put this ordinance together in his sleep. After doing extensive research on our new “TO GOOD TO BE TRUE” city manager, Thirty Miles of Corruption believes he has been a long time advocate for open government. Is Mr. Russo really a champion for the public? As the public gets to know him they like him. He’s a like able guy. The public really liked City Manager George Carvalho and we all know what happened there, the council fired him, remember?…. The question is will Russo hold anyone in his office or the Council and Mayor accountable for violations of our new Sunshine Ordinance? Will our New Sunshine Ordinance have teeth or is it just lip service! My hope for the City of Riverside and new City Manager John Russo is that we can overcome and fix all the MISTAKES that happened in the last 8 years and be an example and good neighbors to all the citizens living in Riverside County..

let-the-sunshine-in1

TMC, RATED RIVERSIDE’S MOST, “RAUNCHY,” “LOW CLASS,” “VISIONS OF GRANDEUR,” “FULL OF B.S.,” “IGNORANT,” “MISGUIDED,” “BULLYISH,” “FILTHY,” “SICK,” “PERVERTED,” “STUPID,” “PATHETIC,” “DESPICABLE,” “DISAPPOINTING,” “BELOW THE BELT,” “A NEW LOW,” “SHOCKING,” “OFFENSIVE,” “INAPPROPRIATE,” “HURTFUL,” “MEAN SPIRITED,” “DISTASTEFUL,” “EMBARRASSING,” HORIFFIC,” “SLANDEROUS” “FIT TO BE VIEWED FROM THE REAR” AND MEZZSPELLED, “MISSPELLED” AND “OPINIONATED” BLOG SITE!  TEMPORARILY BLOCKED BY THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE AT PUBLIC ACCESS SITES WITHIN THE CITY, THEN UNBLOCKED.  I GUESS YOU CANNOT DO THAT ACCORDING TO THE ACLU.  RATED ONE TWO ONE STAR OUT OF FIVE IN TERMS OF COMMUNITY APPROVAL RATINGS..  TMC IS NOW EXCLUSIVLY EXCLUSIVELY ON FILE WITH THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE’S DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE (WE BELIEVE THIS WILL END SOON, SINCE THE FOCUS IS NOW ON THE IMPROPRIETIES OF MR. “Z”.  WE TRIED TO TELL YOU, BUT NOBODY LISTENED), AND DON’T FORGET WE ARE PROSSIBLY POSSIBLY ON FILE WITH THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE’S POTENTIAL SLAPP SUIT LIST… A STRATEGIC LEGAL MANEUVER THAT CAN BE DONE ONLY IN RIVERSIDE WITHOUT A CONTRACT… AGAIN, THANK YOU COMMUNITY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE EMPLOYEE’S FOR YOUR SUPPORT! 

Government operates best when government operates in the open.  City of Riverside City Manager John Russo.  “I Believe in Riverside.”

Mr John Russo,

As the first and maybe the only ‘regional citizen’ of Riverside County, I saw and forecast the need to bring our cities and communities together.  I saw the need for our citizens to take back their governments, and for City Governments to stop the exploitation of its citizens.

I wanted to be part of a movement that would get us back working together.  We had all become creatures of the intimidation and retaliation culture.  We needed to make amends.  For many years a group of very passionate and intelligent citizens  including myself, pleaded with the leadership and executive staff of the City of Riverside to identify the problems you are now discussing, that were eroding our city. We needed to all move on and start building bridges and coalitions to strengthen our city and community.

I am extraordinarily optimistic and hopeful for our future, and this week, I am a proud citizen of Riverside California.  The leadership role our council has taken to be better neighbors is resonating throughout Riverside County.  Working out our issues with our friends through collaborative negotiations instead of a ‘cat fight’ in a court of law, will benefit us all.  Extending the ‘olive branch’ to the citizens of Moreno Valley is the first and right step in bringing our communities back together.  I am excited and hopeful with the direction our city administration is facilitating

I would like to take this time to thank Mayor William “Rusty” Bailey, the Riverside City Council, your staff and yourself  for recognizing and taking our lead.  The need to build bridges and healthy coalitions are far more important and beneficial to our communities, than suing THE CITIZENS of Moreno Valley and fighting with our regional neighbors in a court of law.

I have attended two public meetings where you, ( John Russo) have spoken of your ‘Sunshine Ordinance.’  You stated that Riverside should take the leadership role of our region.  We should bring all local government together.  I believe this will create a stronger, more efficient and healthier government in Riverside County.  The possibilities are endless, and we should be able to set new political standards for the entire State of California.

We have come a long way, I’m sure there will be a couple more bumps in the road but I believe we are moving in the right direction.

Sincerely,

Vivian Moreno

TMC, RATED RIVERSIDE’S MOST, “RAUNCHY,” “LOW CLASS,” “VISIONS OF GRANDEUR,” “FULL OF B.S.,” “IGNORANT,” “MISGUIDED,” “BULLYISH,” “FILTHY,” “SICK,” “PERVERTED,” “STUPID,” “PATHETIC,” “DESPICABLE,” “DISAPPOINTING,” “BELOW THE BELT,” “A NEW LOW,” “SHOCKING,” “OFFENSIVE,” “INAPPROPRIATE,” “HURTFUL,” “MEAN SPIRITED,” “DISTASTEFUL,” “EMBARRASSING,” HORIFFIC,” “SLANDEROUS” “FIT TO BE VIEWED FROM THE REAR” AND MEZZSPELLED, “MISSPELLED” AND “OPINIONATED” BLOG SITE!  TEMPORARILY BLOCKED BY THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE AT PUBLIC ACCESS SITES WITHIN THE CITY, THEN UNBLOCKED.  I GUESS YOU CANNOT DO THAT ACCORDING TO THE ACLU.  RATED ONE TWO ONE STAR OUT OF FIVE IN TERMS OF COMMUNITY APPROVAL RATINGS..  TMC IS NOW EXCLUSIVLY EXCLUSIVELY ON FILE WITH THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE’S DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE (WE BELIEVE THIS WILL END SOON, SINCE THE FOCUS IS NOW ON THE IMPROPRIETIES OF MR. “Z”.  WE TRIED TO TELL YOU, BUT NOBODY LISTENED), AND DON’T FORGET WE ARE PROSSIBLY POSSIBLY ON FILE WITH THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE’S POTENTIAL SLAPP SUIT LIST… A STRATEGIC LEGAL MANEUVER THAT CAN BE DONE ONLY IN RIVERSIDE WITHOUT A CONTRACT… AGAIN, THANK YOU COMMUNITY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE EMPLOYEE’S FOR YOUR SUPPORT!  

 

img078CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE

On April 13, 2015, The Department of Justice for the State of California sent back the following response letter, to the letter below, which indicates the concern of how RPD Law Enforcement, under Chief Sergio Diaz may have abused the CLETS system, by sharing employees/residents restricted information with City of Riverside executes and personal.  The Assistant Bureau Chief, Keith Dann, points out that the Department of Justice takes allegations of potential misuse of CLETS very seriously and will handle this matter pursuant to the CLETS Polices, Practices and Procedures.

taletteroneone  talettertwo    taletterthree

We wrote in a previous posting that TMC and the public had recently learned that City of Riverside had secret investigative teams, which included several city of Riverside departments including Human Resources and the Riverside Police Department, which were organized under the auspices of monitoring, “potentially dangerous,” city employees. and possibly even residents.  In another in a long line of Riverside coincidences, it just so happens that many of these employees were also known whistle blowers within the City at the time they were put under surveillance.  Employees whose only crime was to report fraud within the city of Riverside were subjected to background checks using confidential law enforcement sources, defamed, followed, and threatened – in one incident, threatened with their lives!

It has long been common knowledge that the city has been a hostile place to work if you aren’t ethically-challenged and report wrongdoing.  Just for the record, I’m not just stating this to be dramatic, but to express a truth which has yet to be played out.  What we’re beginning to understand now is the extent that the city was or is willing to go to use public resources in order to cover-up its shameful acts.  The courageous few, who stuck their necks out to protect the taxpayers and ratepayers of Riverside, had their lives turned upside down by the municipal mafia, under the direction and protection of former Riverside City Attorney Gregory Priamos. Now currently Council for the County of Riverside.

Who amongst the other City insiders were the other players in this game of deceit?  Further, was the law enforcement telecommunication system known as CLETS (California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System) used as a tool for defamation and retaliation by former Human Resources Director Rhonda Strout, current Human Resource Director Brenda Diederich and other department heads, thus violating these employees rights to privacy?  How about the coup d’état, the Chief of Police, Sergio Diaz: how was he involved, because the CLETS system as we currently know it is solely a law enforcement tool? 

This secret organization was unbeknownst to even the Human Resources Board, who supposedly reviews HR policies.  They demanded to know more about it!  It was even unbeknownst to the Community Police Review Commission, who supposedly reviews police policies!  It was also unbeknownst to certain City Council members, who supposedly are first in line to receive information before the above-mentioned boards and commissions.  Hold onto your hats, because we get the feeling this story will be explosive.    

TMC has been told this secret panel which is being financed by the taxpayer, is under the guidance of a former Secret Service agent consultant, that investigates whistle blower employees within the city of Riverside in an attempt to intimidate and discredit them.

diaztoutouAs of this date, Riverside Chief Sergio Diaz has yet to respond to the Department of Justice, leaving questions as to why he has refused to be compliant, and what seems to be “dancing around the issues as seen above!”  Many in the community who are taxpayers continue to ask the question as to why the City has continued to condone his irreverent behavior, and why he continues to double dip into the coffers of the Riverside Taxpayer.  Diaz again seems to be only concerned with Diaz, as opposed to the concerns of the Riverside Community.

RIVERSIDE FORGOTTEN: THE J.F. BACKSTRAND BUILDING ON SIXTH AND MAIN MARCH 27, 1940

BACKSTRANDMARCH271940

TMC, RATED RIVERSIDE’S MOST, “RAUNCHY,” “LOW CLASS,” “VISIONS OF GRANDEUR,” “FULL OF B.S.,” “IGNORANT,” “MISGUIDED,” “BULLYISH,” “FILTHY,” “SICK,” “PERVERTED,” “STUPID,” “PATHETIC,” “DESPICABLE,” “DISAPPOINTING,” “BELOW THE BELT,” “A NEW LOW,” “SHOCKING,” “OFFENSIVE,” “INAPPROPRIATE,” “HURTFUL,” “MEAN SPIRITED,” “DISTASTEFUL,” “EMBARRASSING,” HORIFFIC,” “SLANDEROUS” “FIT TO BE VIEWED FROM THE REAR” AND MEZZSPELLED, “MISSPELLED” AND “OPINIONATED” BLOG SITE!  TEMPORARILY BLOCKED BY THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE AT PUBLIC ACCESS SITES WITHIN THE CITY, THEN UNBLOCKED.  I GUESS YOU CANNOT DO THAT ACCORDING TO THE ACLU.  RATED ONE TWO ONE STAR OUT OF FIVE IN TERMS OF COMMUNITY APPROVAL RATINGS..  TMC IS NOW EXCLUSIVLY EXCLUSIVELY ON FILE WITH THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE’S DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE (WE BELIEVE THIS WILL END SOON, SINCE THE FOCUS IS NOW ON THE IMPROPRIETIES OF MR. “Z”.  WE TRIED TO TELL YOU, BUT NOBODY LISTENED), AND DON’T FORGET WE ARE PROSSIBLY POSSIBLY ON FILE WITH THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE’S POTENTIAL SLAPP SUIT LIST… A STRATEGIC LEGAL MANEUVER THAT CAN BE DONE ONLY IN RIVERSIDE WITHOUT A CONTRACT… AGAIN, THANK YOU COMMUNITY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE EMPLOYEE’S FOR YOUR SUPPORT!   COMMENTS ALWAYS WELCOMED, ESPECIALLY SPELL CHECKERS!  WE JUST CAN’T SPELL!  EMAIL ANONYMOUSLY WITH YOUR DIRT BY CONTACTING US AT: THIRTYMILESCORRUPTION@HOTMAIL.COM

 

transparencycalenderbailey

CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE

In a request for Mayor William “Rusty” Bailey’s working schedule for July13, 2015 through July 19,2015, this is what one taxpayer received.  This was submitted to TMC to reveal that this document was redacted of who the Mayor was meeting with, where you see the red arrows.  Whereby taxpayers were insured of a new era for theCity of Riverside with reference to transparency, it appears the same old, same Old song…  What are you hiding Mayor Bailey, something from the public, or something from your family?  Why are you keeping us guessing, I thought your knew policy at City Hall was transparency on steroids.  The only thing that has change at City Hall are the faces.

danielwerfel                 RUSTY

           MAYOR BAILEY                         SORRY, MAYOR BAILEY

TMC, RATED RIVERSIDE’S MOST, “RAUNCHY,” “LOW CLASS,” “VISIONS OF GRANDEUR,” “FULL OF B.S.,” “IGNORANT,” “MISGUIDED,” “BULLYISH,” “FILTHY,” “SICK,” “PERVERTED,” “STUPID,” “PATHETIC,” “DESPICABLE,” “DISAPPOINTING,” “BELOW THE BELT,” “A NEW LOW,” “SHOCKING,” “OFFENSIVE,” “INAPPROPRIATE,” “HURTFUL,” “MEAN SPIRITED,” “DISTASTEFUL,” “EMBARRASSING,” HORIFFIC,” “SLANDEROUS” “FIT TO BE VIEWED FROM THE REAR” AND MEZZSPELLED, “MISSPELLED” AND “OPINIONATED” BLOG SITE!  TEMPORARILY BLOCKED BY THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE AT PUBLIC ACCESS SITES WITHIN THE CITY, THEN UNBLOCKED.  I GUESS YOU CANNOT DO THAT ACCORDING TO THE ACLU.  RATED ONE TWO ONE STAR OUT OF FIVE IN TERMS OF COMMUNITY APPROVAL RATINGS..  TMC IS NOW EXCLUSIVLY EXCLUSIVELY ON FILE WITH THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE’S DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE (WE BELIEVE THIS WILL END SOON, SINCE THE FOCUS IS NOW ON THE IMPROPRIETIES OF MR. “Z”.  WE TRIED TO TELL YOU, BUT NOBODY LISTENED), AND DON’T FORGET WE ARE PROSSIBLY POSSIBLY ON FILE WITH THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE’S POTENTIAL SLAPP SUIT LIST… A STRATEGIC LEGAL MANEUVER THAT CAN BE DONE ONLY IN RIVERSIDE WITHOUT A CONTRACT… AGAIN, THANK YOU COMMUNITY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE EMPLOYEE’S FOR YOUR SUPPORT!   COMMENTS ALWAYS WELCOMED, ESPECIALLY SPELL CHECKERS!  WE JUST CAN’T SPELL!  EMAIL ANONYMOUSLY WITH YOUR DIRT BY CONTACTING US AT:  THIRTYMILESCORRUPTION@HOTMAIL.COM

PR072015

PRESS RELEASE BY CITY OF RIVERSIDE REGARDING AG PARK (CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE OR CLICK LINK TO VIEW PDF) 

A News Released disclosed publicly today July 27th by the City of Riverside that a meeting took place on Friday July 24th with City Manager John Russo and Barbara A. Lee, Director of the Department of Toxic Substance Control for the State of California (DTSC).   The DTSC outlined its intent to work with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on a concurrent review of the site and to identify any appropriate confirmation sampling at the site, which could include sampling of the soil as well as the groundwater.  The letter which requested the EPA to step in was sent on July 23rd and is as follows:

lettertoepa

CLICK THIS LINK TO VIEW FULL LETTER REQUESTING ASSISTANCE FROM THE EPA BY THE DTSC ON JULY 23, 2015

The above document indicates that the reason DTSC was requesting EPA’s assistance was a result of a letter received by the Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice (CCAEJ) March 5, 2015.  In this letter CCAEJ alleged that serious problems occurred before and during cleanup activities on the site, and that nearby residents were potentially exposed to toxic substances.  CCAEJ requested that DTSC and other environmental agencies, EPA, review the adequacy of the clean-up activities of the site.  The main issues the DTSC was asking EPA to review as a result of the CCAEJ allegations were as follows: 1.) Whether any additional soil sampling was necessary onsite and offsite. 2.) Whether any additional ground water monitoring is necessary onsite and offsite.  3.) Whether EPA could provide any assistance to the DTSC in assessing the health related concerns reported by some members of the community around the site.  The letter sent to the DTSC by CCAEJ on March 5th is as follows:

LETTER

 CCAEJ Document Riverside Agriculture Park

The letter from the CCAEJ written to the DTSC stated that the Voluntary Clean Up did not address the following:

1.) AG Park was formerly Camp Anza, a US Army Defense Site, which has potential explosives and chemical warfare material contamination.  This presents a grave threat to the residents living on the three sides of this property and to the construction crews who are presently digging trenches for sewer pipes.

2.) The groundwater is contaminated with PCB’s, perchlorate, lead, thallium, dioxin and furans.  It should be noted that the ground water flows directly into the Santa Ana River which is a primary source of drinking water for Orange County, therefore poses a real threat to that community as a result of potential substandard water quality.

3.) Sampling of the property was not done according to Federal EPA protocol.  It appears that there was “selective sampling” of the property as a result of not following Federal EPA protocol.  Therefore, when samples were taken they were not tested for the full range of contaminants such as metals, explosives, perchlorate, dioxin and furans; which are some of the most toxic chemicals known to science.

4.) A survey of the residents surrounding the AG Park indicate an elevated number of cancers which could indicate a cancer cluster.

5.) Dust monitoring logs indicate a high Part Per Million and particles exceeding the 10 micrometers in diameter in July 2013, this exceeds the maximum health level set by the Air Quality Management District (AQMD), thus causing the contamination of adjoining residential properties and injuring the lungs of residents.  It also appears that the consultants for the City misinformed the DTSC of the true aspects of the site, rather than indicating it was a sewer site whereby toxins were dumped, they indicated the property as a Riverside City Disposal Site for excavated sidewalks and roadways.  Ouch..not cool!  Who were the consultants, were they Adkin Engineering?  The consultants accordingly did not follow AQMD rule 1150, therefore did not send a report that the levels of PCB contaminants exceeded acceptable levels.  Exceeding potential acceptable levels would indicate elevated levels of PCB’s in the air, thus contaminating residential properties and exposing residents to PCB’s.

6.)  The City of Riverside identified ROHR as the source of the PCB’s and identified them the responsible party under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), but did not inform Riverside County or DTSC of this fact.  There was also improper disposal of the main sewer, with the main pipeline to ROHR still remains intact and underground.

AG PARK: FOLLOWING EXPLOSIVE LETTER REVEALS WRONGDOING BY THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE BY CITY EMPLOYEE! “THERE WAS NO BLACK AND WHITE, ONLY SHADES OF GREY..”

kdone     kdtwo   kdothree 

 CLICK IMAGES TO ENLARGE OR CLICK THIS LINK TO VIEW PDF

Cathleen R. Baswell, Administrative Analyst for the City of Riverside, wrote the above letter and filed it with the City Clerk on July 7, 2015.  According to the letter, allegations were made that the City of Riverside had no policy or protocol at the time.  The protocol was assembled at the last minute and possibly used against the 15 workers, that they were at fault, and didn’t follow protocol.  The question is, “Was this assembled protocol used by former City Attorney Greg Priamos when fighting against their workman compensation claims?”

She states in the letter that Brian Nakamura was Public Works Director, while Siobhan Foster was Deputy Director at the time of the 2003 Toxic Sewage Spill.  It appears according to the letter that Foster was the “good soldier,” dependable and loyal, and carried out her superiors orders.  With that, we now have a prominent UCR Toxicologist, Bob Krieger who lied, and threw what was left of integrity out the door.

TMC thanks Ms. Baswell in bringing this story to the forefront and helping City of Riverside employees and the taxpayers.  This places a new light on a culture of cover ups of those in charge who not only endangered employee lives, taxpayer live but created liability for the taxpayers.

TMC, RATED RIVERSIDE’S MOST, “LOW CLASS,” “VISIONS OF GRANDEUR,” “FULL OF B.S.,” “IGNORANT,” “MISGUIDED,” “BULLYISH,” “FILTHY,” “SICK,” “PERVERTED,” “STUPID,” “PATHETIC,” “DESPICABLE,” “DISAPPOINTING,” “BELOW THE BELT,” “A NEW LOW,” “SHOCKING,” “OFFENSIVE,” “INAPPROPRIATE,” “HURTFUL,” “MEAN SPIRITED,” “DISTASTEFUL,” “EMBARRASSING,” HORIFFIC,” “SLANDEROUS” AND MEZZSPELLED, “MISSPELLED” AND “OPINIONATED” BLOG SITE!  TEMPORARILY BLOCKED BY THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE AT PUBLIC ACCESS SITES WITHIN THE CITY, THEN UNBLOCKED.  I GUESS YOU CANNOT DO THAT ACCORDING TO THE ACLU.  RATED ONE TWO ONE STAR OUT OF FIVE IN TERMS OF COMMUNITY APPROVAL RATINGS..  TMC IS NOW EXCLUSIVLY EXCLUSIVELY ON FILE WITH THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE’S DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE (WE BELIEVE THIS WILL END SOON, SINCE THE FOCUS IS NOW ON THE IMPROPRIETIES OF MR. “Z”.  WE TRIED TO TELL YOU, BUT NOBODY LISTENED), AND DON’T FORGET WE ARE PROSSIBLY POSSIBLY ON FILE WITH THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE’S POTENTIAL SLAPP SUIT LIST… A STRATEGIC LEGAL MANEUVER THAT CAN BE DONE ONLY IN RIVERSIDE WITHOUT A CONTRACT… AGAIN, THANK YOU COMMUNITY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE EMPLOYEE’S FOR YOUR SUPPORT!   COMMENTS ALWAYS WELCOMED, ESPECIALLY SPELL CHECKERS!  WE JUST CAN’T SPELL!  EMAIL ANONYMOUSLY WITH YOUR DIRT BY CONTACTING US AT:  THIRTYMILESCORRUPTION@HOTMAIL.COM

frontpgWATER LAW SUIT AGAINST THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA (CLICK LINK TO VIEW FULL LAW SUIT)

On June 4, 2015, the City of Riverside, under newly christened City Attorney Gary Geuss filed suit against the State of California with regards to the issue of having to comply with a 24% cut in usage.  The city asked the state in the suit to include it in a program that lets Northern California entities get away with just 4% cuts because they are taking their water from surface sources, like rivers that are going to dump their contents in the sea if not snatched. The State ignored the City’s request. Riverside gets its water from underground sources, not the surface, and that’s a critical difference to the state.  The problem stems from the Board’s definition of a “reliable water source;” namely, the designation refers only to surface water and not groundwater, or water located underneath the earth’s surface.  So the City filed the above lawsuit in Fresno County Superior Court to stop the State Water Resources Control Board from commanding our City to comply.

In its complaint, Riverside asked the state why a “groundwater-sufficient entity” couldn’t be inserted and was told, “It would simply be too difficult to include groundwater in the 4% tier, but provided no evidence why including groundwater suppliers would be any more difficult than including surface water suppliers. No other reason was giving for listening to one class of water suppliers, but ignoring the other class of water suppliers.”  KPCC said Riverside’s lawsuit was the largest objection registered to date against the state’s water policy. Water districts are just now beginning to implement government directives which aim to implement Governor Jerry Brown’s order that water usage be cut 25% among statewide nonagricultural users. The cuts range between 8% and 36%, compared to comparable time periods in 2013.  Riverside wants a temporary restraining order and injunction to avoid $10,000-a-day fines for noncompliance with an emergency order.

Scott Simpson was former Chief of Enforcement for the California EPA Department of Toxic Substances Control, and also worked for the Department of Food and Agriculture in their Environmental Hazards Assessment Program specializing in ground water contamination.  Simpson tells City Attorney Geuss that he forgot the “winning” argument against the State of California!  The residents have a “contractual right” to water in the City of Riverside, therefore the State of California has no right to impose water restrictions!  The right to water in the City of Riverside is tied to every resident who owns property, for perpetuity.  What is important to note in this law suit is that the City of Riverside admits owning water rights pre-1914, which releases us from the constraints of the Governor Moonbeams imaginary drought emergency.  What people need to realize we are in the year of “El Nino” and we will receive a boat load of water this year, more than we can handle.  Unfortunately, the State of California cannot run a business, how can we allow them to run the State?

SCOTTVIDEOTWOCLICK THIS LINK TO HEAR WHAT CITY ATTORNEY GARY GEUSS FORGOT TO PLACE IN THE LAW SUIT TO PROTECT RESIDENTS WATER RIGHTS, WHICH IS THE RESIDENTS “CONTRACTUAL RIGHT” TO THAT WATER.

Simpson states that water is protected for the use and benefit of all Californians according to the California State Water Resources Control Board. California’s waters cannot be owned by individuals, groups, businesses, or governmental agencies. But permits, licenses, and registrations give individuals and others the right to beneficially use reasonable amounts of water. That’s paraphrased from the California State Constitution. The precise language states that the people of the State of California own the water resources of the State for their use and enjoyment.

scottvideooneCLICK THIS LINK TO VIEW WATER EXPERT SCOTT SIMPSON TALK ABOUT RESIDENTS RIGHT TO WATER

Water Expert Scott Simpson then states that the State of California is the care taker of the water, in charge of improving the quality and making more water available for their use. You are not selling us water you are you provide us with the service of transportation for our use and enjoyment.  So why has the State of California unfortunately betrayed the taxpayers?  Some terms come to mind, “greed,” “incompetence,” “over construction,” and “ineptness.”  Where’s the accountability?  Well folks that will never transpire.

stateofcaqa     stateofcaqatwo

CLICK TO VIEW IMAGES OR CLICK THIS LINK TO VIEW STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD SITE WHICH SIMPSON WAS REFERRING TO

Riverside Public Utilities deputy general manager Kevin Milligan said the city wants the water board to include groundwater in its definition of a reliable water supply.  “The only difference is surface water you can see and groundwater you can’t,” Milligan told the paper.  “We have our own wells and our own water resources,” Riverside Public Utilities spokesperson Heather Raymond told the Los Angeles Times. “No matter how much we save it has zero effect on the state water supply.”  Riverside gets its water from groundwater basins it controls and has a four-year supply on hand. That’s the minimum necessary to be included in the 4% tier. Over the years, the city has drilled wells, captured storm water, invested in a water treatment plant and spent millions on a recycled water infrastructure, Riverside Public Utilities Deputy General Manager Kevin Milligan told the Riverside Press-Enterprise.

The question then became, the City of Riverside doesn’t really have to comply with the State Resources Control Board, since our water rights are pre-1914, and the Control Board was set up thereafter.  Further, the residents who own property in the City of Riverside have a “contractual right” to the that water, as a result of those water rights given to us by a court of law prior to 1914.  The city says it hasn’t imported water from the Colorado River or the State Water Project since 2008.  According to the Courthouse News Service, the city’s complaint says, “(A)ny water that Riverside does not extract will sit in the basin, and cannot be extracted or used by others. Riverside is truly ‘water independent.’ ”  This is something to remember folks, because the City of Riverside is mandated by law to harvest “x” amount of water.  Water cannot be conserved and sit in the ground.  If it does, it can go beyond the acceptable water table, and cause damage and weakness to surrounding infrastructure.

garyguessjokers

Riverside City Attorney Gary Geuss, with double indemnity prior clown behind him, a tough circus act to follow!

Has anybody seen the moniker around town stating “I Own It?”  What does that mean?  It means that if you are a homeowner in the City of Riverside you actually have a “contractual right” to water and you therefore own the “public utilities.”  You may ask, “Why does the City state we are “shareholders” as a result of owning property attached to a home, and then be treated as we are not?”  The straight answer is that the Riverside Water Board represents City interest, therefore not the best interest of the taxpayers is considered.  The only way to protect your rights, your right to water etc. is to form a “taxpayer advocacy” group which will lobby for our rights as homeowners and property owners.

We haven’t even addressed those residents who own rights to the Gage Canal water etc., they can pretty much run there water down the street if they want. There is no drought restriction for them! The point is that are city forefathers made sure there would not be a problem with the access of this important commodity, and this was insured years ago, and pre-1914.  Therefore, are rights to that groundwater should be fought for with a vengeance.  It is as the squirrel who prepared themselves for the winter and stored his food supply early.  Another squirrel comes about, who didn’t prepare, and wants to take it away.  That is what the State of California is attempting to do.

RIVERSIDE PUBLIC UTILITIES ADMITS WE ARE PRE-1914 BY ADVERTISING PROMO.. CUSTOMER OWNED SINCE 1895.

img040two  enlarge1895ownership

What City of Riverside residents must know about the drought misinformation, is that the residents have a “contractual right” to water prior to 1914. Which means that we as a City do not have to comply with the laws regarding drought mandated by Governor Edmund G. Brown, also known as “Moonbeam.”  According to Riverside Public Utilities own advertisement, we have been publicly and customer owned since 1895!  You therefore are not receiving correct information.  Every homeowner in the City of Riverside has a contractual right to water from the publicly owned Bunker Hill Basin in San Bernardino.  The next big question Riversidian’s should be asking is why we as a publicly owned utility should have to advertise to ourselves?  The Riverside Public Utilities spends multitudes of money to promote, which is technically, a public monopoly with reference to utilities.  WHY IS THERE A NEED TO ADVERTISE?  Is it to divert monies to those special clients in the advertising business?  Can this be interpreted as a gift of public funds?  It’s all wrong and should not be done!  Further, the ratepayers demand the utility overages refunded back!  Don’t attempt to try to craft new language and use are reserves to purchase another $40 million dollar building.

RIVERSIDE FORGOTTEN….

1907-riv-randa-railway-002-600

RIVERSIDE & ARLINGTON RAILWAY CO. (CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE)

TMC, RATED RIVERSIDE’S MOST, “LOW CLASS,” “VISIONS OF GRANDEUR,” “FULL OF B.S.,” “IGNORANT,” “MISGUIDED,” “BULLYISH,” “FILTHY,” “SICK,” “PERVERTED,” “STUPID,” “PATHETIC,” “DESPICABLE,” “DISAPPOINTING,” “BELOW THE BELT,” “A NEW LOW,” “SHOCKING,” “OFFENSIVE,” “INAPPROPRIATE,” “HURTFUL,” “MEAN SPIRITED,” “DISTASTEFUL,” “EMBARRASSING,” HORIFFIC,” “SLANDEROUS” AND MEZZSPELLED, “MISSPELLED” AND “OPINIONATED” BLOG SITE!  TEMPORARILY BLOCKED BY THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE AT PUBLIC ACCESS SITES WITHIN THE CITY, THEN UNBLOCKED.  I GUESS YOU CANNOT DO THAT ACCORDING TO THE ACLU.  RATED ONE TWO ONE STAR OUT OF FIVE IN TERMS OF COMMUNITY APPROVAL RATINGS..  TMC IS NOW EXCLUSIVLY EXCLUSIVELY ON FILE WITH THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE’S DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE (WE BELIEVE THIS WILL END SOON, SINCE THE FOCUS IS NOW ON THE IMPROPRIETIES OF MR. “Z”.  WE TRIED TO TELL YOU, BUT NOBODY LISTENED), AND DON’T FORGET WE ARE PROSSIBLY POSSIBLY ON FILE WITH THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE’S POTENTIAL SLAPP SUIT LIST… A STRATEGIC LEGAL MANEUVER THAT CAN BE DONE ONLY IN RIVERSIDE WITHOUT A CONTRACT… AGAIN, THANK YOU COMMUNITY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE EMPLOYEE’S FOR YOUR SUPPORT!   COMMENTS ALWAYS WELCOMED, ESPECIALLY SPELL CHECKERS!  WE JUST CAN’T SPELL!  EMAIL ANONYMOUSLY WITH YOUR DIRT BY CONTACTING US AT:  THIRTYMILESCORRUPTION@HOTMAIL.COM

jones_RUSSO-copy-620x465      manager-lee-mcdougal2

                          ROCK STAR RUSSO                                REAR VIEW MCDOUGAL

I’m going to go with the notion that these two can’t get enough of each others egos or maybe because they will be starting a new private gentlemen’s club in Riverside. Never the less it will be great material for Thirty Miles.

This is my problem, Mr Lee McDougal doesn’t need the job! He has a pension of 211,000.00 each and every year for the rest of his life. The City of Riverside Just paid him an additional 145,000.00 for 6 months of service. And now we want to pay him an additional 37,000.00 per year. Thats approx $400,000,00 he will be paid this year.This is nothing more than Mr Russo taking care of his buddy… I thought this kind of management was over. He may be qualified for the job but I’m sure there are a lot of people qualified for the job that live in Riverside, who actually need the job like Jason Hunter,.Jason is way more qualified for this job than McDougal.

Mr McDougal we thank-you for your service to our city but we are over it now. Its time for you to move on. Stop being GREEDY!

According to a posting on Next Door Wood Streets Neigborhood site, the City of Riverside’s Intergovernmental and Communications Officer (AKA City Spokes Hole), Phil Pitchford released the following posting indicating newly hired Riverside City Manager John Russo will be contracting the services of former interim Riverside City Manager Lee McDougal.  Rock Star Russo is proposing to systematically audit all city departments on a rotating basis as part of a program headed to the City Council for its endorsement on Tuesday (7/28). Russo proposes to start with the city’s largest department – Riverside Public Utilities – and two others, Finance and Human Resources, which interact with all other city departments.  McDougal will be contracted out at $37,000.00 per year to manage the audit program, plus will be paid expenses and mileage, and would be paid out of the City Manager’s existing budget.  Another good example of ‘recycled executive trash?”

The tentative rotation for audits would be:
Fiscal year 2015/16 – Riverside Public Utilities, Finance, Human Resources
Fiscal year 2016/17 – Riverside Police Department, Community and Economic Development, City Manager’s Office
Fiscal year 2017/18 – Riverside Fire Department; Public Works; Parks, Recreation and Community Services
Fiscal year 2018/19 – General Services Department, Innovation and Technology, Museum and Cultural Affairs
Fiscal year 2019/20 – Riverside Public Libraries, City Clerk, City Attorney

SITEONE      SITETWO

CLICK IMAGES TO ENLARGE

What seems to be unclear about the Next Door Wood Street Neighborhood site is why the City of Riverside is a participant.  The site is for homeowners of the wood street and surrounding Riverside neighbors, and one of the criteria is that you are a “homeowner.”  Residential taxpayers are asking the question if this is a City of Riverside monitoring site, to actually see what residents may not be “team players.”  Was it started by the City of Riverside, some even mentioned former Mayor Ron Loveridge’s name.  You know those conspiracy theorist in our neighborhood. No one has since “denied” or “acknowledged” that this may or may not be true.

According to the Legislative Counsel’s Digest, AB 194, Campos. Open Meetings: Public Criticism and Comment states under SECTION 1. Section 54954.3 of the Government Code is amended to read: 54954.3.

public comment

CLICK THIS LINK TO VIEW FULL DOCUMENT ON public criticism, which McDougal may not have agreed with…
(c) (1) Subject to reasonable regulations promulgated pursuant to subdivision (b), the legislative body of a local agency, or its presiding officer or staff, acting in their official capacity on behalf of the legislative body, shall not prohibit, limit, or otherwise prevent any of the following: (A) Public criticism of the policies, procedures, programs, or services of the agency, or of the acts or omissions of the legislative body or its officers or employees acting in their official capacity.

McDougal who is remembered by the residents of the City by how he attempted to control public speakers at the podium by changing the camera view.  The new camera position viewed public speakers from the rear end at a far distance.  This didn’t allow viewers to see speakers mannerisms and facial expression.  What came about was that this was reversed by Russo.  People still couldn’t figure out why McDougal did this.  Some residents felt he attempted to treat them as small children, which was taken as a personal insult.  A second layer of this rear view action, was he actually attempting to control the message and our 1st Amendment right to free speech in a public arena?  The overall picture the community saw, was that he was just attempting to punishing the community if they didn’t act right.  Well TMC found that McDougal didn’t morally act right in the City of Montclair according to sources, which now changes the perspective of behavior to contradiction.  Regardless, this is how taxpaying residents are viewing him.

THINKING FROM BEHIND IS WHY MANY CANNOT THINK FORWARD: AS IS THE CASE WITH INTERIM CITY MANAGER LEE MCDOUGAL:  HERE YOU GO LEE, THANKS FOR THE MEMORIES.. HORSES ASS IS TOO GOOD FOR YOU, WILL STICK TO A DONKEY’S ASS..

8SadieRearCLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE, IF YOU DARE…

UPDATE: RPOA (RIVERSIDE POLICE OFFICER’S ASSOCIATION) EMBEZZLEMENT SCAM CONTINUES TO EMBARRASS BOARD OF DIRECTORS.  Questions have arose if RPD or individuals in law enforcement who are their to serve and protect the public, can they “competently handle money?”  In this case it was a whole lot of money to the tune of $337,017.07!  Again, this was all under the nose of President Brian Smith and Vice President Aurelio Melendrez (Council Andy’s son), and wasn’t until RPD Detective Money (real name) figured it out.  At the time of her arrest, Detective Brian Money, of the Riverside Police Department economic crimes unit, said Archibeque was highly trusted and had access to and most of the control over financial records – a mistake he said is common among small businesses and nonprofit organizations that are victimized by embezzlers.  I don’t think so Det. Money Bags, the majority of all non-profits and businesses have the two check process, implemented to avoid such embarrassing situations. Again 300K, that is shear incompetence to leave one individual in charge, with no secondary oversight in order to verify outgoing payments.

But the thing to remember this happened through a slew of highly tax paid law enforcement officers.  The good officers of RPD should be asking for their resignation, if you need help contact TMC.  It only stands to reason why they, RPOA, debacled the Councilman Soubirous character assassination, and abused the very integrity of their association, therefore placing a “black eye” against the “troops” and the community of Riverside.

weloveourceleryAs in this pic, Smith and Melendrez were just simply distracted by the size of the salary celery…  Was this why they didn’t catch that measly $337, 017.07 of RPD Officers money?

JUST FOR LAUGHS! NO PUN ON RPOA…

image1

RIVERSIDE FORGOTTEN….

large

TMC, RATED RIVERSIDE’S MOST, “LOW CLASS,” “VISIONS OF GRANDEUR,” “FULL OF B.S.,” “IGNORANT,” “MISGUIDED,” “BULLYISH,” “FILTHY,” “SICK,” “PERVERTED,” “STUPID,” “PATHETIC,” “DESPICABLE,” “DISAPPOINTING,” “BELOW THE BELT,” “A NEW LOW,” “SHOCKING,” “OFFENSIVE,” “INAPPROPRIATE,” “HURTFUL,” “MEAN SPIRITED,” “DISTASTEFUL,” “EMBARRASSING,” HORIFFIC,” “SLANDEROUS” AND MEZZSPELLED, “MISSPELLED” AND “OPINIONATED” BLOG SITE!  TEMPORARILY BLOCKED BY THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE AT PUBLIC ACCESS SITES WITHIN THE CITY, THEN UNBLOCKED.  I GUESS YOU CANNOT DO THAT ACCORDING TO THE ACLU.  RATED ONE TWO ONE STAR OUT OF FIVE IN TERMS OF COMMUNITY APPROVAL RATINGS..  TMC IS NOW EXCLUSIVLY EXCLUSIVELY ON FILE WITH THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE’S DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE (WE BELIEVE THIS WILL END SOON, SINCE THE FOCUS IS NOW ON THE IMPROPRIETIES OF MR. “Z”.  WE TRIED TO TELL YOU, BUT NOBODY LISTENED), AND DON’T FORGET WE ARE PROSSIBLY POSSIBLY ON FILE WITH THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE’S POTENTIAL SLAPP SUIT LIST… A STRATEGIC LEGAL MANEUVER THAT CAN BE DONE ONLY IN RIVERSIDE WITHOUT A CONTRACT… AGAIN, THANK YOU COMMUNITY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE EMPLOYEE’S FOR YOUR SUPPORT!   COMMENTS ALWAYS WELCOMED, ESPECIALLY SPELL CHECKERS!  WE JUST CAN’T SPELL!  EMAIL ANONYMOUSLY WITH YOUR DIRT BY CONTACTING US AT:  THIRTYMILESCORRUPTION@HOTMAIL.COM

gjone          

GRAND JURY COMPLAINT FILED JULY 20, 2015 (CLICK ABOVE IMAGES TO ENLARGE)

On July 20, 2015, the Riverside County Grand Jury received the following complaint filed by former Riverside Deputy City Attorney Raychele Sterling.  The Officials in the complaint are Council members Mike Gardner, Chris Mac Arthur and John Burnard; Mayor William “Rusty” Bailey and City Clerk Colleen Nicol.

2014-gardner  2013-macarthur  2015-burnard  untitled-2  2013__11__nicol-300x300

On July 14, 2015, Councilmen Gardner, MacArthur and Burnard voted to approve a motion made by MacArthur and seconded by Gardner to accept the Mayor’s Nominating Screening Committee (“Screening Committee”) recommendations for regional organization assignments.

The vote was a tie, 3 for approval and 3 against, which was broken by Mayor Bailey in support of acceptance of the recommendation. One of the recommendations therein was that Mayor Rusty Bailey serve as the member of Riverside County Transportation Committee (“RCTC”) with Councilman Melendrez as the alternate. This recommendation was in direct contradiction of the Rules of Procedure and Order codified in Resolution No. 22796 (“Rules”) adopted by the City Council and executed by Mayor Rusty Bailey on January 27, 2015, in that the senior Councilmember, Melendrez, had indicated his preference for the member position as required by the Rules.  The rule states as follows:

To the greatest extent possible for Standing Committee and regional organization appointments, preference of senior Councilmembers shall be honored. Councilmembers shall forward preferences on Standing Committee assignments to the City Clerk to be shared at the Mayor’s Nominating and Screening Committee.

pic

CLICK THIS LINK TO VIEW VIDEO ON ITEM 5

Well folks this didn’t happen.  The senior Council member on board was Andy Melendrez, and it was his preference to stay on board. The three council votes plus the breaking Mayors vote discounted Council member Melendrez’s request. On the other hand, the question arose, was Melendrez holding on to a senior position meant that he could hold on to the position indefinitely, which means that very act could be a problem, after all he was on four boards.

Regardless, the Rules mandate that the RCTC member position be assigned to the most senior Council member, Melendrez. It is also important to note, that the Rules do not provide for a preference to be submitted by the Mayor, only the City Council. Therefore, any assignment preferences made by the Mayor should have been immediately rejected by the City Clerk and not forwarded to the Screening Committee for review and consideration. The City Clerk’s actions of forwarding the assignment preference of the Mayor to the Screening Committee was outside the scope of her authority granted by Resolution No. 22796.

resolution

CLICK THIS LINK TO VIEW FULL RESOLUTION 22796

To add further drama to the picture, during his introduction of the agenda item, Mayor Bailey inappropriately interjected his perceived qualifications for the member position, noting a letter of recommendation drafted on his behalf by Supervisor John Tavaglione, for whom he had worked as a legislative aide while employed by the County of Riverside. It is also believed that Mayor Bailey is a close personal friend of Supervisor Tavaglione’s, often socializing with him and his family.  Again, the City Clerk’s action of providing this letter to the Screening Committee and including it in the City Council Agenda packet was inappropriate and outside the scope of her authority under Resolution No. 22796. Complainant believes that Supervisor Tavaglione’s attempt to influence the committee assignments in violation of Resolution No. 22796 is indicative of the incestuous relationship between certain “chosen” elected officials of the City and the County Board of Supervisors and constitutes yet another act of political favoritism and cronyism that has plagued both the County and the City of Riverside for years.  

Unknown-444

Did we have an concerted orchestrated attempt to take over, or simply a political coup d’État, to change the players in this Chess game, in order to ensure future favorable outcomes?  Our the Riverside County Supervisors part of the problem or all of the problem?  I Rusty Bailey wants to sit on that board, he should have changed the rules of the resolution which he actually executed back in January of 2015!  Instead he skipped the step, and in doing so violated his own resolution.  Sorry, can’t do that.

godfatherartwork14 copyI guess in some cases you can impersonate a law enforcement officer and become Senator, as is the case with Jeff Stone, the one with the bat.  In other cases as this PE story, whereby someone impersonated a fire fighter, you just simply go to jail…

FROM THE DESK OF SCOTT SIMPSON REGARDING THE INFORMATION DISCLOSED BY HIRED UCR TOXICOLOGIST BOB KRIEGER AND THE HANDLING OF THE AG PARK SPILL:

SEWER03122015

Scott Simpson was the former Chief of Enforcement for the California EPA Department of Toxic Substances Control, and also worked for the Department of Food and Agriculture in their Environmental Hazards Assessment Program specializing in ground water contamination.

Our Courts have ruled in criminal environmental cases that, omitting information critical to the event under review is a form of lying to the government. Sometimes it is charged as lying to a federal investigator and in other cases it has been a charge of falsifying federal documents or reports.
Leaving out of any communication with your employees or public, the pertinent facts that could way heavily on their health could be charged as a crime. So, lying by omission is what our city did. They left out all the information about the health hazards posed by exposure to all the other hazardous waste ingredients in the sludge. They had the knowledge but, instead hired an “Expert” to tell the employees that PCBs are not that toxic. The obvious question is, “Why are PCBs classified in federal and state law as Hazardous Waste? It is because, PCBs are dangerous to your health and the environment! Congress passed the TOSCA statute in the late 1970s specifically to stop the manufacture and use of PCBs in America! What the city never told anyone is, that PCBs contain other more dangerous chemicals from the manufacturing process called, Dioxins and Furans. These are the toxins of concern in this discussion. There are others to worry about at Ag Park too.

UPDATE: DTSC IS SCHEDULED TO MEET WITH THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE FRIDAY JULY 24, 2015 WITH REFERENCE TO CLEARANCE DOCUMENTS FOR AG PARK.  WE WILL KEEP YOU POSTED OF THE RESULTS.  ROCK STAR RUSSO SEEMED TO BE PERTURBED THE LAST TIME DTSC WAS IN TOWN, BECAUSE THEY ACTUALLY WANTED HEAR FROM THE PUBLIC AND DID NOT WANT TO MEET WITH THE CITY.  DOES ROCK STAR RUSSO GO BY ANOTHER NAME WHILE IN OAKLAND CALIFORNIA?  STAY TUNED TO TMC, BECAUSE WE HAVE IT….

jones_RUSSO-copy-620x465

AND ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER ALEX NGUYEN, WE HAVEN’T FORGOTTEN YOU!  THANKS TO OUR NEW FRIENDS IN OAKLAND CALIFORNIA WHO HAVE CONTACTED TMC.

TMC, RATED RIVERSIDE’S MOST, “LOW CLASS,” “VISIONS OF GRANDEUR,” “FULL OF B.S.,” “IGNORANT,” “MISGUIDED,” “BULLYISH,” “FILTHY,” “SICK,” “PERVERTED,” “STUPID,” “PATHETIC,” “DESPICABLE,” “DISAPPOINTING,” “BELOW THE BELT,” “A NEW LOW,” “SHOCKING,” “OFFENSIVE,” “INAPPROPRIATE,” “HURTFUL,” “MEAN SPIRITED,” “DISTASTEFUL,” “EMBARRASSING,” HORIFFIC,” “SLANDEROUS” AND MEZZSPELLED, “MISSPELLED” AND “OPINIONATED” BLOG SITE!  TEMPORARILY BLOCKED BY THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE AT PUBLIC ACCESS SITES WITHIN THE CITY, THEN UNBLOCKED.  I GUESS YOU CANNOT DO THAT ACCORDING TO THE ACLU.  RATED ONE TWO ONE STAR OUT OF FIVE IN TERMS OF COMMUNITY APPROVAL RATINGS..  TMC IS NOW EXCLUSIVLY EXCLUSIVELY ON FILE WITH THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE’S DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE (WE BELIEVE THIS WILL END SOON, SINCE THE FOCUS IS NOW ON THE IMPROPRIETIES OF MR. “Z”.  WE TRIED TO TELL YOU, BUT NOBODY LISTENED), AND DON’T FORGET WE ARE PROSSIBLY POSSIBLY ON FILE WITH THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE’S POTENTIAL SLAPP SUIT LIST… A STRATEGIC LEGAL MANEUVER THAT CAN BE DONE ONLY IN RIVERSIDE WITHOUT A CONTRACT… AGAIN, THANK YOU COMMUNITY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE EMPLOYEE’S FOR YOUR SUPPORT!   COMMENTS ALWAYS WELCOMED, ESPECIALLY SPELL CHECKERS!  WE JUST CAN’T SPELL!  EMAIL ANONYMOUSLY WITH YOUR DIRT BY CONTACTING US AT:  THIRTYMILESCORRUPTION@HOTMAIL.COM


Vivian Moreno ask for an appointment with Foster to find the truth about what happen at AG Park, and who ordered 15 city and sewer workers to clean up a toxic sewage spill or subsequently be fired. The workers went in without proper clothing to protect themselves against an alleged unknown substance. If the city and developer stated, they did not know the substance was, why didn’t they call in Haz-Mat or the Fire Department as required by city policy? What’s really remarkable is the Public Works Department and part of the Fire Department are in the same building.  Questions lingered regarding a then Riverside City Councilman who’s engineering company was hired by said AG Park developer. The Public Works Director at the time was Siobhan Foster, who came from a finance background.  In her Public Work Director position she has no engineering degree, engineering license or engineering experience.  The on going joke at Riverside Public Works at the time, from employees, was that she didn’t even know what a “pot hole” was.

Jason Hunter expressed his disdain with reference to “recycled executive staff.” Siobhan Foster left the City of Riverside only to be hired on as Public Works Director for the City of Pasadena, by her former boss, City Manager Michael Beck. Her department then became embroiled in a $6.4 million embezzlement scheme under her watch. She was then fired without cause, therefore receiving severance and health care benefits amounting to $150, 000.00. She was then hired by the City of Covina for the same position by City Manager Andrea Miller, who was also former City Manager of San Bernardino. Miller at one point stated that Foster demonstrated that she has strong analytical skill or problem solving skills. Analytical skills? She missed a $6.4 million theft! Covina Councilman Walt Adams, described the mess in Pasadena as going on long before Foster was there. The fact remains, the majority of the theft happened during Foster’s tenure. Pasadena City Manager Michael Beck stated regarding Foster, “If they don’t have an incident in their city whereby you have a “rogue” employee acting in an illegal fashion, then they shouldn’t be concerned.” Well alrighty now, again no accountability but continued defense of bad decision making behavior.

DON’T FORGET TO COMMENT…COMMENTERS WELCOME!

TMC, RATED RIVERSIDE’S MOST, “LOW CLASS,” “VISIONS OF GRANDEUR,” “FULL OF B.S.,” “IGNORANT,” “MISGUIDED,” “BULLYISH,” “FILTHY,” “SICK,” “PERVERTED,” “STUPID,” “PATHETIC,” “DESPICABLE,” “DISAPPOINTING,” “BELOW THE BELT,” “A NEW LOW,” “SHOCKING,” “OFFENSIVE,” “INAPPROPRIATE,” “HURTFUL,” “MEAN SPIRITED,” “DISTASTEFUL,” “EMBARRASSING,” HORIFFIC,” “SLANDEROUS” AND MEZZSPELLED, “MISSPELLED” AND “OPINIONATED” BLOG SITE!  TEMPORARILY BLOCKED BY THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE AT PUBLIC ACCESS SITES WITHIN THE CITY, THEN UNBLOCKED.  I GUESS YOU CANNOT DO THAT ACCORDING TO THE ACLU.  RATED ONE TWO ONE STAR OUT OF FIVE IN TERMS OF COMMUNITY APPROVAL RATINGS..  TMC IS NOW EXCLUSIVLY EXCLUSIVELY ON FILE WITH THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE’S DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE (WE BELIEVE THIS WILL END SOON, SINCE THE FOCUS IS NOW ON THE IMPROPRIETIES OF MR. “Z”.  WE TRIED TO TELL YOU, BUT NOBODY LISTENED), AND DON’T FORGET WE ARE PROSSIBLY POSSIBLY ON FILE WITH THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE’S POTENTIAL SLAPP SUIT LIST… A STRATEGIC LEGAL MANEUVER THAT CAN BE DONE ONLY IN RIVERSIDE WITHOUT A CONTRACT… AGAIN, THANK YOU COMMUNITY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE EMPLOYEE’S FOR YOUR SUPPORT!   COMMENTS ALWAYS WELCOMED, ESPECIALLY SPELL CHECKERS!  WE JUST CAN’T SPELL!  EMAIL ANONYMOUSLY WITH YOUR DIRT BY CONTACTING US AT:  THIRTYMILESCORRUPTION@HOTMAIL.COM